At 01:21 AM 3/3/00 -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>[.OP]FH.1..5
>ok 1
>ok 2
>ok 3
>ok 4
>%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual address=000C,
>PC=000A9938, PS=001B
Now that's odd, and not good. It works OK with Dec C 6.2 & VMS 7.2, FWIW.
At 12:27 AM -0500 3/3/2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>At 11:53 PM 3/2/00 -0500, Charles Bailey wrote:
>>I managed to fold in (I think) all of the new VMS-specific changes
>>through early this evening (including a fix for the dratted ACCVIO --
>>an incorrect initialization of PERL_INC_VERSION_LIST in
>>
At 11:53 PM 3/2/00 -0500, Charles Bailey wrote:
>I managed to fold in (I think) all of the new VMS-specific changes
>through early this evening (including a fix for the dratted ACCVIO --
>an incorrect initialization of PERL_INC_VERSION_LIST in
>subconfigure.com), re-integratied the mainline change
I managed to fold in (I think) all of the new VMS-specific changes
through early this evening (including a fix for the dratted ACCVIO --
an incorrect initialization of PERL_INC_VERSION_LIST in
subconfigure.com), re-integratied the mainline changes, and put
up a new test kit here (named, imaginativ
Here's a quick patch that might fix the whole problem with h_errno on
pre-7.1 systems. Could someone try this out (with an otherwise unhacked
perl) and see if it gets through things? (It's harmless in 7.2 with Dec C
6.2)
--- vms/subconfigure.com;-4 Thu Mar 2 17:00:22 2000
+++ vms/subconfigur
5.5.670 will *not* configure if you're SET DEFAULTed to the source
directory via DECNet. This isn't something I'm seeing as a particularly big
problem, mind, but just in case you were wondering...
Dan
--"it's like this
This will hopefully become irrelevant very soon, but if anyone is
curious how badly we are faring with all the other tests, this will
at least let the test suite get past openpid.t. I'm not sending this
to p5p because it's essentially saying things are ok that aren't, so I
don't know that it
I did note the following informational during the compilation with DEC C V6.0-001
on OpenVMS Alpha V7.1:
CC/DECC /Include=[]/Standard=Relaxed_ANSI/Prefix=All/Obj=.obj/NoList/Define=PERL_CORE
REGEXEC.C
yes:
^
%CC-I-UNREACH, code can never be executed at label yes
at line number 3249 in
> I've tried to look a bit more into the test failure Charles Lane
> reported. What it boils down to is this. In 5.005_03, we get:
>
> $ perl -e "use VMS::Filespec; print vmsify('some/../../where/over/the.rainbow');"
> [-.where.over]the.rainbow
>
> which is what the vmsfspec.t test expects, b
I've tried to look a bit more into the test failure Charles Lane
reported. What it boils down to is this. In 5.005_03, we get:
$ perl -e "use VMS::Filespec; print vmsify('some/../../where/over/the.rainbow');"
[-.where.over]the.rainbow
which is what the vmsfspec.t test expects, but in 5.5.670
My previous patch omitted one thing; this should be applied on top of it:
--- vms/descrip_mms.template;-1 Wed Mar 1 21:55:53 2000
+++ vms/descrip_mms.templateThu Mar 2 15:01:21 2000
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
ac3 = $(ARCHCORE)form.h $(ARCHCORE)gv.h $(ARCHCORE)handy.h $(ARCHCORE)hv.h
ac4 = $(ARCH
At 1:18 PM -0500 3/2/2000, Charles Bailey wrote:
> > --- t/comp/script.t;-0 Mon Feb 28 00:58:49 2000
>> +++ t/comp/script.t Wed Mar 1 18:44:39 2000
>> @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
>>
>> print "1..3\n";
>>
>> -$PERL = ($^O eq 'MSWin32') ? '.\perl' : './perl';
>> +$PERL = ($^O eq 'MSWin32') ? '.\perl' : (
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 01:07 PM 3/1/00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > On the other hand, other folks on other platforms have reported problems
> > > with the version variable, and that's where this could be dying.
> >
> >Are you referring to $] ?
>
> Yup. It looks
> --- t/comp/script.t;-0 Mon Feb 28 00:58:49 2000
> +++ t/comp/script.t Wed Mar 1 18:44:39 2000
> @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
>
> print "1..3\n";
>
> -$PERL = ($^O eq 'MSWin32') ? '.\perl' : './perl';
> +$PERL = ($^O eq 'MSWin32') ? '.\perl' : (($^O eq 'VMS') ? 'MCR []perl.' : './perl');
Already fix
| Charles Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > ...with all patches to date except the
| > revised pipe PPFs (waiting for Charles Lane's new stuff; BTW, could
| > we just use a read-only DCL procedure, say Perl_Root:[lib]start_subprocess.com,
| > instead of writing a temp file each time?)
|
| We
| At 11:56 PM -0500 3/1/2000, Charles Bailey wrote:
| >I cobbled together a new test kit (vmsperl_pre56_2.tgz, of course)
| >from the current repository with all patches to date except the
| >revised pipe PPFs
|
| So that's 5.5.670 plus your changes and anything else applied to the repository
|t
--- t/comp/script.t;-0 Mon Feb 28 00:58:49 2000
+++ t/comp/script.t Wed Mar 1 18:44:39 2000
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
print "1..3\n";
-$PERL = ($^O eq 'MSWin32') ? '.\perl' : './perl';
+$PERL = ($^O eq 'MSWin32') ? '.\perl' : (($^O eq 'VMS') ? 'MCR []perl.' : './perl');
+
$x = `$PERL -le "print 'o
On Thu, 02 Mar 2000 11:05:34 CST, "Craig A. Berry" wrote:
>The following patch is forwarded on behalf of Charles Lane, who says,
>
>"There were complaints from pragma/warnings.t about a missing semicolon
>after "fred()" ... so I added a bunch of 'em, just to make sure :-)
>And the blank line betwe
The following patch is forwarded on behalf of Charles Lane, who says,
"There were complaints from pragma/warnings.t about a missing semicolon
after "fred()" ... so I added a bunch of 'em, just to make sure :-)
And the blank line between the EXPECT and the subsequent is needed;
in t/pragma/wa
Charles Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...with all patches to date except the
> revised pipe PPFs (waiting for Charles Lane's new stuff; BTW, could
> we just use a read-only DCL procedure, say Perl_Root:[lib]start_subprocess.com,
> instead of writing a temp file each time?)
Well, I like the
Francesco Gennai wrote:
>
> If I remember well, some times ago I read something about Perl
> scripts to convert from Microsoft Word to other format (Postscript ?)
>
> Is there anyone that can give me a pointer to such Perl scripts (to run
> on VMS, of course) ?
>
> thank you,
> regards
> France
"Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 04:03 PM 3/1/00 -0500, lane @ DUPHY4.Physics.Drexel.Edu wrote:
>>"Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > The only patch that was omitted because of my patching skills I repeat here
>> > (still don't know why applying it failed):
>> >
>> >
If I remember well, some times ago I read something about Perl
scripts to convert from Microsoft Word to other format (Postscript ?)
Is there anyone that can give me a pointer to such Perl scripts (to run
on VMS, of course) ?
thank you,
regards
Francesco Gennai
23 matches
Mail list logo
