At 5:19 PM -0800 11/27/00, Peter Prymmer wrote:
>[.lib]filter-util...FAILED on test 2
> $ perl lib/filter-util.t
> 1..28
> %RMS-E-FNF, file not found
> %RMS-E-FNF, file not found
>This appears to be an extra VMS only SYS$ERROR message.
Peter, I get the same results. At first blush it l
Your e-mail has been received by the Perl Bug Squashing Team.
A Bug ID (20001127.007) has been assigned and is shown in the subject of this email.
Please include this bug ID in the subject line of any followup messages.
This is an automatic confirmation message.
--
Perl Bug Squashing Team
This is a build failure report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
generated with the help of perlbug 1.33 running under perl v5.7.0.
-
[Please enter your report here]
[.lib]filter-util...FAILED on test 2
Failed 1 test, 95.33% o
At 09:10 AM 11/24/00 -0500, Denis Laroche wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>Redo the thing from the beginning, only this time start with:
>>
>>perl makefile.pl "POLLUTE=1"
>>
>>and you should be fine.
>>
>Thanks for the info Dan.
>
>It built and tested ok but now I'm getting an access violation when u
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> We probably ought to see if we can manage to drop perl's voracious appetite
> for memory somehow. It really is exceedingly piggish at times. (D'you know
> if it's less excessive with perl's malloc in use?)
No I do not know. That is a good question
At 10:07 AM 11/27/00 -0800, Peter Prymmer wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > Yeah, but that number will change with Dec C version and optimization
> > settings, and perl version as various source modules get abused. It's
> > probably best to just leave the recommendation at 1
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Yeah, but that number will change with Dec C version and optimization
> settings, and perl version as various source modules get abused. It's
> probably best to just leave the recommendation at 100K--if a system can't
> muster that for an account to
At 06:52 PM 11/26/00 +0100, Martin Vorlaender wrote:
>As a prerequisite, I tried to install Digest::MD5 v2.12. With both
>SHA1.xs and MD5.xs, the DEC C optimizer seems to got into a loop.
>I ctrl-C'ed out of it after 10 minutes. Building them /NoOpt went fine.
That's odd. I've never encountered t
Patrick Spinler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, I've reached my frustration limit.
Getting the
%DCL-F-FRUSLIM, Frustration limit reached, system lockup expected soon
message?
> I'm rebuilding perl (or attempting to). I've got the perl-5.6.0 dist
> from cpan, and the various patches from www
