Craig,
By "bad" I didn't mean anything judgmental :-) (though you could fault
me for a terrible choice of a non-judgmental word, huh).
We've run into various troublesome logial names; the one that bit me was
"TEST".
>From readme.vms
troublesome logicals and symbols are:
TMP "LOGICAL"
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Carl Friedberg wrote:
> Whatever, it's worth a mention, as it's been uncovered by great
> detective work.
It was indeed good work. How about applying the following patch to
perl@8585? Would anyone object?
diff -ru perl.8585.org/README.vms perl.8585/README.vms
--- perl.85
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> At 11:13 AM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
> > Warning: I could not locate your pod2man program. As
> >a last choice,
> > I will look for the file to which the
> >logical name POD2MAN
> >
At 04:43 PM 2/1/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:40:41, "Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>At 4:03 PM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, I'm trying the builds on the system that has the v5.6-003 C
>>>
At 4:45 PM -0500 2/1/01, Carl Friedberg wrote:
>"DOWN"
>
>Ok, who's the "bad logical names" pumpking?
It's not really a bad logical name; it's a more general issue arising
from the fact that the device component of a path spec undergoes
logical name translation before the unix-to-vms syntax chang
"DOWN"
Ok, who's the "bad logical names" pumpking?
Carl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Error while building Perl 5.6.0
OK, found the problem. This test doesn't pass when
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:40:41, "Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 4:03 PM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>>
>> Well, I'm trying the builds on the system that has the v5.6-003 C
>> complier now, and it seems the Sigjmp_buf errors are all gone,
>>
Title: RE: Error while building Perl 5.6.0
OK, found the problem. This test doesn't pass when you have DOWN defined as a logical name :) I guess I can consider this a PASS, right?
- Paul
-
ISD::[PERL-5_6_0]> @[.vms]test .ex
At 4:03 PM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>
> Well, I'm trying the builds on the system that has the v5.6-003 C
> complier now, and it seems the Sigjmp_buf errors are all gone,
> but the errors relating to fcntl() are all still present. I'm
>
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:04:28, "Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 03:28 PM 2/1/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>>2) Lo-and-Behold, I've got v5.6-003 on another node in the cluster.
>>Don't know how it got there, and I really don't care. But
At 03:28 PM 2/1/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>2) Lo-and-Behold, I've got v5.6-003 on another node in the cluster.
>Don't know how it got there, and I really don't care. But
>it's there and I'm having much better luck under it. Still
>
The new Compaq educational program might be able to get you a newer C compiler
very cheaply. IIRC, basically for the cost of media with possibly a small
yearly fee for the whole Compaq catalog. There is some problem with the license
being single user or something (David Mathog has complained bit
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:17:26, Jordan Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The new Compaq educational program might be able to get you a newer C compiler
>very cheaply. IIRC, basically for the cost of media with possibly a small
>yearly fee for the whole Compaq catalog. There is some p
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 13:34:57, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 01:15 PM 2/1/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>> >At 01:01 PM 2/1/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>> >>
>> >>OK, Dan. Here's IO.LIS for your perusal. /LIST/SHOW=(HEADERS,SOURCE) are
>>
At 02:05 PM 2/1/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 13:34:57, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>You basically need to upgrade your C compiler then try the build again.
>
>
>Ouch. With most all development here moving to Tru64 (OpenVMS
>w
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> At 10:01 AM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>
> >Do you have a package to recommend that is possibly smaller in scope
> >than EmuMail, that would have some modicum of use once installed, that
> >I could tr
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:44:42, Peter Prymmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
> >
> >> Uncompressing of the .tar files I did on a Unix box. I then FTP the .tar
> >> files to
For those of you who might be wondering, we did track down the ultimate
reason for the errors being thrown when building the perl modules. It turns
out that the version of Dec C that was being used to build things was
5.0-003, a rather old and creaky version of things. Perl itself had been
bui
At 04:46 PM 1/31/2001 -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>At 03:08 PM 1/31/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
> >On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:06:18, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>You might want to try MMK from MadGoat instead, though it's a matter of
> personal preference,
At 3:56 PM -0800 1/31/01, Peter Prymmer wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>> Nope. MMK's more forgiving of things than MMS is, which is the only reason
>> I mentioned it. (MMS won't let you redefine things that MMK and
>>Unix make will)
>
>BTW I'd like to take this opportunity
At 12:53 PM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>$ perl Makefile.PL INST_LIB=[-.temp] INST_ARCHLIB=[-.temp.vms]
>
>I really don't understand the significance of these parameters;
Why are you specifying these explicitly at all?
--
_
At 11:13 AM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
> Warning: I could not locate your pod2man program. As
>a last choice,
>I will look for the file to which the
>logical name POD2MAN
>points when MMK is invoked.
>
>
>**
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 12:41:59, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Writing Descrip.MMS for IO
>> CC/DECC
>>
>>/Include=[]/Standard=Relaxed_ANSI/Prefix=All/Obj=.obj/List/Machine/Defin
>>
>>e=("VERSION=""1.20""","XS_VERSION=""1.20""")/Include=(perl_root:[lib.
At 11:13 AM 2/1/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 11:08:43, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>At 10:01 AM 2/1/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>>>On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 09:00:22, "Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
At 8
At 10:01 AM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>Do you have a package to recommend that is possibly smaller in scope
>than EmuMail, that would have some modicum of use once installed, that
>I could try out to see if it WILL build and install against this
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 11:08:43, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 10:01 AM 2/1/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>>On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 09:00:22, "Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>At 8:52 AM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
At 09:43 AM 2/1/2001 -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>At 10:01 AM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>
>>Do you have a package to recommend that is possibly smaller in scope
>>than EmuMail, that would have some modicum of use once installed,
>> that
>>I coul
At 10:01 AM 2/1/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 09:00:22, "Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>At 8:52 AM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>>> I would have assumed that the perl binary was built on this
>>> machine.
>>
At 8:58 AM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>
>I'll try the /MACRO_DEBUG (sp?) suggestion I saw earlier to try to
>fathom the error Craig claims is odd.
/macro=__debug__=1, which causes the make to add
/noopt/debug/list/show=all to the compile qualifiers. At
Not that it should necessarily make any difference, but is the build
tree on an ODS 5 volume?
Peter Prymmer
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> At 09:35 AM 1/31/2001 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >During the test phase, I had one failure -
> >
> >[.lib]vmsfspec..FAILE
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 09:00:22, "Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 8:52 AM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>> I would have assumed that the perl binary was built on this machine.
>> Other test suites that the installation of perl incorporated seem t
At 8:52 AM -0500 2/1/01, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:44:42, Peter Prymmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >If you do not mind it running GUNZIP.EXE on VMS is also a possibility.
>>I'd venture to say that most folks who make use of perl on VMS, hence the
>>CPAN mod
This is a success report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
generated with the help of perlbug 1.33 running under perl v5.6.1.
Perl reported to build OK on this system.
---
Flags:
category=install
severity=none
---
Site configuration information for perl v5.6.1:
Configured by system at Thu
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:43:22, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 04:46 PM 1/31/2001 -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>At 03:08 PM 1/31/2001 -0500, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>> >On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:06:18, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>You might want to tr
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:44:42, Peter Prymmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818 wrote:
>
>> Uncompressing of the .tar files I did on a Unix box. I then FTP the .tar
>> files to OpenVMS and run VMSTAR to split them out. Now I'm manually trying to
>> b
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:46:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CC/DECC /Include=[]/Standard=Relaxed_ANSI/Prefix=All/Obj=.obj/List/Machine
/Define=("VERSION=""1.20""","XS_VERSION=""1.20""")
/Include=(perl_root:[lib.VMS_AXP.5_00503.CORE])/Optimize IO.c
Sigjmp_buf je_buf;
36 matches
Mail list logo
