Re: [PATCH Perl@12307] sigaction test

2001-10-11 Thread Craig A. Berry
At 5:55 PM -0400 10/11/01, Charles Lane wrote: >Craig A. Berry writes: >I don't think it's a matter of not having the right signal handler... >IIRC, if you "raise()", then the signal handler works as advertised. Hmm. Perhaps kill() doesn't check to see if the pid it gets is that of the current p

Re: [PATCH Perl@12307] sigaction test

2001-10-11 Thread Charles Lane
Craig A. Berry writes: > At 5:30 PM -0400 10/10/01, Charles Lane wrote: > >Perl's signal handling fails pretty badly for me on VMS 6.2you > >tell the CRTL that you want to ignore SIGHUP, but when you do a > >"kill SIGHUP,$$" it still blows away your program. > >test program to a VMS 7+ machine

Re: [PATCH Perl@12307] sigaction test

2001-10-11 Thread Craig A. Berry
At 5:30 PM -0400 10/10/01, Charles Lane wrote: >Perl's signal handling fails pretty badly for me on VMS 6.2you >tell the CRTL that you want to ignore SIGHUP, but when you do a >"kill SIGHUP,$$" it still blows away your program. > >I tried this in C and found the same behavior, independent of

Re: [PATCH Perl@12307] sigaction test

2001-10-11 Thread lane
lane (Charles Lane)@DUPHY4.Physics.Drexel.Edu writes: > Perl's signal handling fails pretty badly for me on VMS 6.2you > tell the CRTL that you want to ignore SIGHUP, but when you do a > "kill SIGHUP,$$" it still blows away your program. Bad form to follow-up my own posts, I know...but I just