Re: [PATCH] t/test.pl, which_perl, VMS

2002-05-30 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:14:15PM -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote: > The $^X discussion led me to discover that we had $Config{_exe} > missing, and fixing that led me to discover that we really shouldn't > be using it the way which_perl does because the Perl we use to run > the test suite doesn't

[PATCH] t/test.pl, which_perl, VMS

2002-05-30 Thread Craig A. Berry
The $^X discussion led me to discover that we had $Config{_exe} missing, and fixing that led me to discover that we really shouldn't be using it the way which_perl does because the Perl we use to run the test suite doesn't have any extension at all. The patch below fixes the second of two com

Re: [PATCH configure.com] _ext -> _exe

2002-05-30 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 06:32:43PM -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote: > The $^X discussion has led me to the discovery that we have the wrong > variable name in %Config for the extension on an executable file. Thanks, applied. > --- configure.com;-0Tue May 28 18:12:55 2002 > +++ configure.com

[PATCH configure.com] _ext -> _exe

2002-05-30 Thread Craig A. Berry
The $^X discussion has led me to the discovery that we have the wrong variable name in %Config for the extension on an executable file. --- configure.com;-0Tue May 28 18:12:55 2002 +++ configure.com Thu May 30 17:49:12 2002 @@ -5082,7 +5082,7 @@ $ WC "PERL_API_VERSION='" + api_version

Re: [PATCH perl@16893] lib/blib.t tweak for VMS

2002-05-30 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:22:40PM -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote: > We wer failing these because 'blib/lib' doesn't look like 'blib.lib]'. Thanks, applied. > --- lib/blib.t;-0 Thu May 30 09:32:45 2002 > +++ lib/blib.t Thu May 30 16:04:08 2002 > @@ -57,7 +57,12 @@ > is( @INC, 3, '@INC now h

[PATCH perl@16893] lib/blib.t tweak for VMS

2002-05-30 Thread Craig A. Berry
We wer failing these because 'blib/lib' doesn't look like 'blib.lib]'. --- lib/blib.t;-0 Thu May 30 09:32:45 2002 +++ lib/blib.t Thu May 30 16:04:08 2002 @@ -57,7 +57,12 @@ is( @INC, 3, '@INC now has 3 elements' ); is( $INC[2],'../lib', 'blib added to the front of @INC' ); -

Re: [PATCH: perl@16826] small updates to DCL portions of perl kit

2002-05-30 Thread PPrymmer
Craig Berry wrote: !>+to temporarily work around the problem, or if you are brave !>+and do not might the possibility of breaking IPv6 addresses, ! !I think that should read "mind the possibility" -- otherwise looks good. Indeed it should read as you've re-worded it. Amusing that the spell che

Re: [PATCH: perl@16826] small updates to DCL portions of perl kit

2002-05-30 Thread Craig A. Berry
At 1:57 PM -0400 5/30/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >+to temporarily work around the problem, or if you are brave >+and do not might the possibility of breaking IPv6 addresses, I think that should read "mind the possibility" -- otherwise looks good. -- Cr

Re: [PATCH: perl@16826] small updates to DCL portions of perl kit

2002-05-30 Thread PPrymmer
Craig Berry wrote: !Good show, Peter, though I think that should read "third party TCP/IP !stack" rather than vendor If we want to be more !generous-sounding, we could say it's an incompatibility between the !vendor-supplied socket library and the third party IP stack. Hunter Goatley has a

Re: perldoc problems in 5.6.1 (was Re: further perlbuild problems (was Re: Configure not working))

2002-05-30 Thread Brian Tillman
>>%DCL-W-IVVERB, unrecognized command verb - check validity and spelling >> \MOST\ >>%DCL-W-IVVERB, unrecognized command verb - check validity and spelling >> \MORE\ >>%DCL-W-IVVERB, unrecognized command verb - check validity and spelling >> \LESS\ > >You're stuck with those unless you install one