Craig A. Berry wrote:
At 7:56 PM -0600 11/29/07, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Craig A. Berry wrote:
I've tried taking what's in Ken's repository and putting it in blead
and it introduces several test failures. The most significant
problem is that the new function VMS::Filespec::vms_realname returne
At 7:56 PM -0600 11/29/07, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>
>>I've tried taking what's in Ken's repository and putting it in blead
>>and it introduces several test failures. The most significant
>>problem is that the new function VMS::Filespec::vms_realname returned
>>garbage when
Craig A. Berry wrote:
At 8:44 AM -0600 11/29/07, John E. Malmberg wrote:
I just applied the File::Spec::VMS patch, but I think that the
cwd.t/Cwd.pm one has been applied by Craig as #32053 (or I'm confused.)
Can you confirm ?
So I think that what is now in the core is what should be released o
At 8:44 AM -0600 11/29/07, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>>I just applied the File::Spec::VMS patch, but I think that the
>>cwd.t/Cwd.pm one has been applied by Craig as #32053 (or I'm confused.)
>>Can you confirm ?
>>
>>So I think that what is now in the core is what should be released on CPAN.
After
At 11:07 AM +0100 11/29/07, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
>I just applied the File::Spec::VMS patch, but I think that the
>cwd.t/Cwd.pm one has been applied by Craig as #32053 (or I'm confused.)
>Can you confirm ?
>
>So I think that what is now in the core is what should be released on CPAN.
It is
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On 29/11/2007, John E. Malmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday, November 27, 2007, at 11:48AM, "Rafael Garcia-Suarez"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note also: we have a couple of patches pending by John Malmberg, one to
cwd.t and one to File::Spec::VMS (if I don
On 29/11/2007, John E. Malmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, November 27, 2007, at 11:48AM, "Rafael Garcia-Suarez"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Note also: we have a couple of patches pending by John Malmberg, one to
> >>> cwd.t and one to File::Spec::VMS (if I don't for
John E. Malmberg wrote:
[I will repost to the lists in a few hours for archival]
Craig Berry wrote:
On Tuesday, November 27, 2007, at 11:48AM, "Rafael Garcia-Suarez"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note also: we have a couple of patches pending by John Malmberg, one to
cwd.t and one to File::Spe
Craig Berry wrote:
On Tuesday, November 27, 2007, at 11:48AM, "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note also: we have a couple of patches pending by John Malmberg, one to
cwd.t and one to File::Spec::VMS (if I don't forget any). I think I may
apply them to bleadperl then, if noon
On Tuesday, November 27, 2007, at 03:25PM, "Craig Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>On Tuesday, November 27, 2007, at 11:48AM, "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" <[EMAIL
>PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Note also: we have a couple of patches pending by John Malmberg, one to
>>cwd.t and one to File::Spec::VMS (i
On Tuesday, November 27, 2007, at 11:48AM, "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Note also: we have a couple of patches pending by John Malmberg, one to
>cwd.t and one to File::Spec::VMS (if I don't forget any). I think I may
>apply them to bleadperl then, if noone objects.
Fine b
On 27/11/2007, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> File::Spec in the core (and to a lesser extent, Cwd) is now
> significantly different from the CPAN release. A unified diff
> between the core code and version 3.25_01 (with standard context) is
> about 500 lines lo
Hi,
File::Spec in the core (and to a lesser extent, Cwd) is now
significantly different from the CPAN release. A unified diff
between the core code and version 3.25_01 (with standard context) is
about 500 lines long, mostly because 3.25_01 was never integrated
into the core, but also
13 matches
Mail list logo
