Craig A. Berry wrote:
At 12:36 PM -0600 2/1/05, John E. Malmberg wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Craig Berry wrote:
I believe 64-bit integers and large file support now work correctly
(and independently) in bleadperl and those changes should make it
into 5.8.7.
I do not have bleadperl, but they are not
At 12:36 PM -0600 2/1/05, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Craig Berry wrote:
>
>> I believe 64-bit integers and large file support now work correctly
>> (and independently) in bleadperl and those changes should make it
>> into 5.8.7.
>
>Unfortunately you did not implement the not very
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Craig Berry wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 31, 2005, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>
> >The configure tests for largefile support is based on if the integer type
> >is native 64 bits.
>
> I believe 64-bit integers and large file support now work correctly
> (and independently) in blea
On Monday, January 31, 2005, at 04:40PM, John E. Malmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The configure tests for largefile support is based on if the integer type
>is native 64 bits.
If you're looking at 5.8.6, all of the 64-bit tests were lumped together under
64-bit integers, which is just pla
The configure tests for largefile support is based on if the integer type
is native 64 bits.
On VMS, the off_t type becomes 64 bits if the _LARGEFILE macro is defined
in the test program.
Which means logically the support for largefile on VMS should be based on
the presences of off_t being detect
