Re: Next test kit

Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 07:49 AM 3/3/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>To summarize: >> EOFs come at subprocess exit, so Perl isn't producing them >> EOFs occur whether SYS$OUTPUT is explicitly defined in LIB$SPAWN, >> defaulted in LIB$SPAWN (old pipe schem

Re: Next test kit

At 07:49 AM 3/3/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >To summarize: > EOFs come at subprocess exit, so Perl isn't producing them > EOFs occur whether SYS$OUTPUT is explicitly defined in LIB$SPAWN, > defaulted in LIB$SPAWN (old pipe scheme), > or by DEFINE in command procedure

Re: Next test kit

Charles Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Charles Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > ...with all patches to date except the > | > revised pipe PPFs (waiting for Charles Lane's new stuff; BTW, could > | > we just use a read-only DCL procedure, say Perl_Root:[lib]start_subprocess.com, > |

Re: Next test kit

| Charles Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > ...with all patches to date except the | > revised pipe PPFs (waiting for Charles Lane's new stuff; BTW, could | > we just use a read-only DCL procedure, say Perl_Root:[lib]start_subprocess.com, | > instead of writing a temp file each time?) | | We

Re: Next test kit

| At 11:56 PM -0500 3/1/2000, Charles Bailey wrote: | >I cobbled together a new test kit (vmsperl_pre56_2.tgz, of course) | >from the current repository with all patches to date except the | >revised pipe PPFs | | So that's 5.5.670 plus your changes and anything else applied to the repository |t

Re: Next test kit

Charles Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ...with all patches to date except the > revised pipe PPFs (waiting for Charles Lane's new stuff; BTW, could > we just use a read-only DCL procedure, say Perl_Root:[lib]start_subprocess.com, > instead of writing a temp file each time?) Well, I like the

Re: Next test kit

At 11:56 PM -0500 3/1/2000, Charles Bailey wrote: >I cobbled together a new test kit (vmsperl_pre56_2.tgz, of course) >from the current repository with all patches to date except the >revised pipe PPFs So that's 5.5.670 plus your changes and anything else applied to the repository today? >BTW, I

Next test kit

I cobbled together a new test kit (vmsperl_pre56_2.tgz, of course) from the current repository with all patches to date except the revised pipe PPFs (waiting for Charles Lane's new stuff; BTW, could we just use a read-only DCL procedure, say Perl_Root:[lib]start_subprocess.com, instead of writing