ssage-
From: Craig A. Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Error while building Perl 5.6.0
At 4:45 PM -0500 2/1/01, Carl Friedberg wrote:
>"DOWN"
>
>Ok, who's the "bad logical names"
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Carl Friedberg wrote:
> Whatever, it's worth a mention, as it's been uncovered by great
> detective work.
It was indeed good work. How about applying the following patch to
perl@8585? Would anyone object?
diff -ru perl.8585.org/README.vms perl.8585/README.vms
--- perl.85
a pass.
>
>Carl
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 4:44 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Error while building Perl 5.6.0
>
>
>OK, found the problem. This test doesn't pass when y
"DOWN"
Ok, who's the "bad logical names" pumpking?
Carl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Error while building Perl 5.6.0
OK, found the problem
Title: RE: Error while building Perl 5.6.0
OK, found the problem. This test doesn't pass when you have DOWN defined as a logical name :) I guess I can consider this a PASS, right?
- Paul
-
ISD::[PERL-5_6_0]> @[.
Not that it should necessarily make any difference, but is the build
tree on an ODS 5 volume?
Peter Prymmer
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> At 09:35 AM 1/31/2001 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >During the test phase, I had one failure -
> >
> >[.lib]vmsfspec..FAILE
At 09:35 AM 1/31/2001 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>During the test phase, I had one failure -
>
>[.lib]vmsfspec..FAILED on test 54
>
>Is this a "Bad Thing (tm)"?
I have a vague memory that there was something in vmsfspec where the test
did not keep up with a change in the api, bu
Title: RE: Error while building Perl 5.6.0
Thanks to all that replied. PGFLQ and WSEXTENT/WSMAX are the critical combination. I'm not sure what the mins are, but I set PGFLQ=10 and WSEXTENT=40960 and it compiled.
During the test phase, I had one failure -
[.lib]vms
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I decided today to try building 5.6.0 on my VAX (VMS 6.2, DECC 5.7). I
> pulled latest.tar.gz and applied the patches from www.crinoid.com. I then
> ran CONFIGURE.COM. So far, so good. I then started the build (using MMK)
> and it began compilin
I had this same problem on our VAX. I finally used the http_server account
to compile (with mms) successfully with the following quotas:
Maxjobs: 0 Fillm: 179 Bytlm: 334946
Maxacctjobs: 0 Shrfillm: 0 Pbytlm: 0
Maxdetach: 0 BIOlm: 164 JTquo
10 matches
Mail list logo
