Sorry for the mistake.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dan Chernin
Sent: Mon 3/21/2005 9:44 PM
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: VB error in 4.3.7
In certain situations, when trying to create an object from a "Thread Per
Object" VB ActiveX Exe, I get error
In certain situations, when trying to create an object from a "Thread Per
Object" VB ActiveX Exe, I get error 462: "The remote server machine does not
exist or is unavailable"; on closer examination, it turns out that the exe
just suddenly "vanished". I can reproduce this consistently in VNC 4.3.7,
Wez:
Heya. So exactly what qualifies as a "failed authentication
attempt"? I was trying to connect to a 4.1.1 server (Free edition)
using a tunneling application, and I saw the same error message.
It's possible the tunneling application connects to the VNC Server
with some NULL characters at init
Thanks, both, for your responses (and any more that may follow!). :)
I'll send a copy of the email to the RealVNC staff and anyone who I can find
that can pick through the GPL to the required level.
Cheers!
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
B
Thanks for the education on the two separate IP
address. I know just enough to hurt myself :)~
So I should have ONLY typed in the 66.140.92.18.
And about her not being able to connect to me while I
was in listening mode.
I did have port 5500 open and routed to my computer.
But me being the b home
Curious indeed. The realVNC website clearly states the GPL is in effect
(for the free version). I would think your scenario is similar to a Linux
distro that is commercially sold yet contains MANY titles licensed under the
GPL. One difference, however, is that your app "must have" the VNC binari
but you right on about it being a win2000pro box
--- Erik Soderquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> onboard NIC, windows 2000/XP, correct?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Buddy Craigg
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 19:09
> To: vn
I got this very kindly from Paul Putkowski "off list" It works well,
however you get a new session each time you connect.
I have subsequently also written up a script in to place in init.d. So I
have both sessions that are started on Boot into runlevel 3,4, & 5, and
sessions that can be started by
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Collins, Kevin (MindWorks) [Contractor] wrote:
The original "legal" question had nothing to do with either of these
versions of the software (directly) - it was about the legality of
selling another software package for installing VNC.
OK. I guess another thread got mixed in
The original "legal" question had nothing to do with either of these
versions of the software (directly) - it was about the legality of
selling another software package for installing VNC.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Mike Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 1
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Erik Soderquist wrote:
huh? it was my understanding that people were using vnc, so how could it
be nonexistent?
We're talking about our questions about the forthcoming releases of two
currently nonexistent programs: VNC Personal Edition...
http://www.vnc.com/download.html
..
Have a look at:
http://www.prosig.com/protor/kbase/vnc-install.html
for instructions on how to start VNC via xinetd
RedHat/Fedora users (probably other linux variants as well) can use the
vnc-ltsp-config package from Fedora Extras(*) to do this. Enable XDMCP
via your (local) login manager, and
/
huh? it was my understanding that people were using vnc, so how could it
be nonexistent?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 15:05
To: Erik Soderquist
Cc: Collins, Kevin (MindWorks) [Contractor]; Miles Beck; VNC List
Subject: RE: Co
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Erik Soderquist wrote:
keep those emails, have a lawyer look at the license agreement, and if
still no response, you at least have records of attempting to contact
and acting in good faith. I'm not a lawyer, so try that at your own
risk.
No license agreement applies to quest
Assuming the VNC setup is done to perform encryption and NT domain
authentication.
Is the process of initial communication between VNC viewer and VNC server until
authentication process is unencrypted. This means to say when Viewer sends
request to server for connectivity, server authenticate
keep those emails, have a lawyer look at the license agreement, and if
still no response, you at least have records of attempting to contact
and acting in good faith. I'm not a lawyer, so try that at your own
risk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Be
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Collins, Kevin (MindWorks) [Contractor] wrote:
I have to agree - I asked the same type of questions about Enterprise
VNC for Unix (which costs $$!) twice and have not gotten any response...
Anyone?
I can only add my agreement. My interpretation is that "soon" does not
reall
I have to agree - I asked the same type of questions about Enterprise
VNC for Unix (which costs $$!) twice and have not gotten any response...
Anyone?
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Miles Beck
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:34 AM
To
You can also have specific vnc servers started at boot time on RedHat.
See /etc/init.d/vncserver.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Erik Soderquist
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:31 AM
To: James B. White; vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject:
nope, it's just some cheap nic card
--- Erik Soderquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> onboard NIC, windows 2000/XP, correct?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Buddy Craigg
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 19:09
> To: vnc-list@realvn
Bob,
"Too many security failures" indicates that the IP address from which you
are connecting has been making lots of connections to the VNC Server that
didn't end up being successfully authenticated.
This is a security feature designed to prevent dictionary attacks on
servers, by preventing mach
I use RealVNC for remote administration on roughly 100 pcs. I have
mainly v3.3.7 running but I have started using v4.0.
I've downloaded RealVNC v 4.1 Free Ed. and installed it on a Win2000 (sp
5) server to test it. Initially everything worked fine but then I
started getting the error message "T
I can't say for certain, but I think that may be the mac "intelligently"
turning off the display functions when it detects the monitor
disconnected. I've had almost no experience with macs though, this is
just a guess on my part.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Erik,
The VNC Mirror Driver is an optional component that existing VNC Enterprise
Edition servers can be configured to use if installed. The VNC Hooks method
remains the default scheme, though.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Soderquist [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Chris,
It sounds like you need to find out how to tell the Mac to assume that there
is a monitor always connected, rather than to auto-detect it.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
> Sent: 21 March
will the mirror driver be optional or required in the installation?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of James Weatherall
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:10
To: 'Mark Jacobs'; vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: Graphical Update Slowdown when bei
Good luck getting a response. I posted to the list with a question I had about
the Personal Edition and did not get a response. Then I emailed James and still
did not get a response.
I'd still like some information on when the Personal Edition is going to come
out. If they do not plan a release so
Hi,
Im using VNC to remote a mac, and connecting via other macs and pcs. I
dont have enough space for a monitor for the controlled mac computer.
Does anyonre know if it is possible to disconnect the monitor so just
the machine will be running alone? I tried and the remote just goes
fuzzy and b
I still haven't managed to do what I want. I want to start VNC via inetd
and then start some applications for the user.
I've tried the XDM, XDMCP route. The problem with this is that uers need
to login! Our users are members of the general public who won't know
anything about logins. Therefore
Mark,
How much effect VNC Server has on system performance depends heavily upon
the system hardware & drivers. One things you may wish to try is disabling
"Capture alpha-blended windows" in the "Capture Method" tab of VNC Server
Properties. Capturing of alpha blended windows requires use of Wind
Have a look at:
http://www.prosig.com/protor/kbase/vnc-install.html
for instructions on how to start VNC via xinetd. It's very simple, and
works no problems for me (Redhat 7.2 & 9 from Linux, Windows & Solaris)
Alasdair
I can almost guarantee that it can't use xinetd and never has, someone
please
NO! This isn't correct - you can use inetd to spawn multiple VNC
connections for both the same or multiple users - that's what I am doing
on both Linux & Solaris.
Basically inetd listens on port 5901 (in my case), and new connections
are created on another port (you don't need to know which, bu
I can almost guarantee that it can't use xinetd and never has, someone
please correct me if I am inaccurate?
as to the redhat install, how are you starting the vnc server?
personally, I telnet to the linux host (RH 9 and RH ent 3) and run
vncserver -geometry 1024x768
watch what display number I
the comma indicates multiple ip addresses. use one or the other. since I
suspect you are trying to connect across the internet, I would recommend
the 66.140.92.18 address as the other one is a non-routable internal
address.
the vnc listening viewer option would require you to have tcp port 5500
un
onboard NIC, windows 2000/XP, correct?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Buddy Craigg
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 19:09
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: UPDATE: please help configure internal / external IP address
I didnt really figure
if I understand the structure correctly, using xinetd won't work as
xinetd spawns a new daemon subprocess for each connection on the same
port. the first connection *might* succeed, but each subsequent one
would fail since the new process would try to bind to a port another
process is already liste
We have VNC Enterprise 4.1.3 server installed as a service on some
client Win XP Pro SP2 PCs. We use VNCViewer from the supervisor PC to
"look at" active screens. We have noticed that when a PC is being
viewed, the graphical updates on the viewed PC are slowed down to a
point where :-
1) The u
I would have to say your best bet would be to contact the authors rather
than this list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Dainty
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 05:57
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: "Bundling" VNC? (Repost)
I'm rep
The link for the documentation for remoting the 0 console is here:
http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/x0.html
this will allow you to remotely use your normal session.
--Angelo
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:03:05 -, James Weatherall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> The problem you'
Barry,
How long are you leaving the desktop alone for when you get the connection
reset by peer message?
Are you running any firewall (including Windows Firewall) on the broken XP
box?
Are the two laptops connecting over identical network connections?
Are the two laptops using identical hardwar
Hi there,
The problem you're seeing is that the programs you're using assume that
you'll only run one copy per-user - they aren't capable of running as the
same user but on different desktops. This is a long-standing issue with
many Gnome applications, if I remember correctly.
You can either kil
41 matches
Mail list logo
