Re: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-14 Thread Uwe Dippel
AIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC) > > Searching the MS knowledge base only brought up the following article > titled > Windows 95 Can Access Up to Two GB of RAM > > http://support.micro

RE: RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-13 Thread Beau . Haefke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC) Searching the MS knowledge base only brought up the following article titled Windows 95 Can Access Up to Two GB of RAM http://support.microsoft.com/def

RE: RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-13 Thread Steve Palocz
for about 6months without problem. Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uwe Dippel Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; James ''Wez'' Weatherall; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj

Re: RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread Uwe Dippel
I don't have the link ready here, but actually, it is 512 MB. You should find this from the M$-knowledge-base as well. At least, I did. --- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys, > > I was told by someone i tust greatly that Windows 98 should not have > more then 256Mb of RAM inst

Re: RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guys, I was told by someone i tust greatly that Windows 98 should not have more then 256Mb of RAM installed, the rest is either not used or makes the machine misbehave. Regards, Edwin "James ''Wez'' Weatherall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread ViNCe
> Nope, nothing flagged, and no unknown devices. > 384mb ram, 81% system-resourses free, virtual memory OFF, > file-system 32bit 81% system resources free is extremely low for a 384Mb machine that's not even running anything. Having said that, Windows 98 is particularly bad at dealing with large a

Re: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread James ''Wez'' Weatherall
> Hmmm. Thanks for pointing that out, James. When I'm > at a braindead point in my proposal writing, I will > certainly check it out. But I wonder if ViNCe or > anyone else can provide personal accounts of how well > ZRLE encoding works relative to TightVNC. ZRLE is at least as good at Tight in

RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread James ''Wez'' Weatherall
> Nope, nothing flagged, and no unknown devices. > 384mb ram, 81% system-resourses free, virtual memory OFF, > file-system 32bit 81% system resources free is extremely low for a 384Mb machine that's not even running anything. Having said that, Windows 98 is particularly bad at dealing with large

RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread Sam
Well, I've also noticed this 15 seconds delay before being able to take the controle of the mouse. As [EMAIL PROTECTED] handles both ZRLE and Tight encoding, comparizons are more easy: - It is when the connection is really slow : < 56Kbit/s - It happens ONLY with Tight encoding. Mouse handli

RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread James ''Wez'' Weatherall
Vince, > > Your comment about XP and BSODs doesn't seem to relate to VNC, > > so I'll skip that. :) > > upon the point that it only happens when connecting VNC viewer > set to scale > screen to 8/9 You hadn't mentioned VNCviewer scaling crashing the machine before! This is a known issue with cer

RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread ViNCe
> Your comment about XP and BSODs doesn't seem to relate to VNC, > so I'll skip that. :) upon the point that it only happens when connecting VNC viewer set to scale screen to 8/9 > The screenshots you posted show that VNC has determined an effective > bandwidth between the two hosts of only 10kbp

RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread James ''Wez'' Weatherall
Vince, Firstly, a couple of requests: Please don't flag all messages as high priority, since this completely negates the point of having the flag available! Please don't tag all messages with the request receipt flag set! Now, regarding your query: The fac

RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread ViNCe
> > W> When it's not frozen, what > > W> is the VNC session like? > > most of the time:very slow, disconnects every 2-25 min > > (ping is about 300, most of the time) > > sometimes i get a realy fast connection, without trouble, > > but i cannot find any reason why this happens. > > This is

RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread James ''Wez'' Weatherall
> W> When it's not frozen, what > W> is the VNC session like? > > most of the time:very slow, disconnects every 2-25 min > (ping is about 300, most of the time) > sometimes i get a realy fast connection, without trouble, > but i cannot find any reason why this happens. This is probably t

RE: RealVNC slowness (WinVNC)

2003-06-12 Thread James ''Wez'' Weatherall
Vince, Connection freezes are usually associated with a poor network connection - either the ISDN line is shared by many people and starts dropping lots of packets, or it's actually got a high bit error rate and causes TCP to drop them, or worse, to corrupt the protocol stream. When it's