Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-08-04 Thread Dave Love
"William Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dave Love said: >> "William Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Any thoughts? >> >> I defined `max' in the header before it was used. > > I think this might be a case of too much snipping, but "huh?" Could you > elaborate? That's what I did t

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-08-01 Thread William Hooper
Dave Love said: > "William Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Any thoughts? > > I defined `max' in the header before it was used. I think this might be a case of too much snipping, but "huh?" Could you elaborate? -- William Hooper ___ VNC-List m

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-08-01 Thread Dave Love
"William Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any thoughts? I defined `max' in the header before it was used. ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-08-01 Thread Tim Waugh
I needed this patch to compile VNC 4.0 Beta 3 on some platforms. Tim. */ --- vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/Xregion/Makefile.in.fPIC 2003-03-31 16:07:29.0 +0100 +++ vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/Xregion/Makefile.in 2003-08-01 10:35:14.0 +0100 @@ -12,4 +12,5 @@ $(AR) $(library) $(OBJS)

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-31 Thread William Hooper
Tim Waugh said: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:52:26AM -0400, William Hooper wrote: > >> Using RHL 9 (gcc-3.2.2) that gets me past x0vncserver, but then I get >> errors building vncviewer: >> >> make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/whooper/build/vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/vncviewer' [snip] >> make[1]: *** [CC

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-31 Thread Tim Waugh
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:07:37PM +0100, James Weatherall wrote: > RealVNC is pleased to announce the first public beta release of VNC 4.0. This is great news! Do you have an idea of when a final VNC 4.0 release might happen? Thanks, Tim. .. off to beta test */ [demime 0.99d.1 removed an atta

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-31 Thread Tim Waugh
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:52:26AM -0400, William Hooper wrote: > Using RHL 9 (gcc-3.2.2) that gets me past x0vncserver, but then I get > errors building vncviewer: > > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/whooper/build/vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/vncviewer' > c++ -I.. -I../tx -I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -Wa

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-31 Thread William Hooper
Dave Love said: > Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'm having compile problems with the unix sources on Gentoo 1.4. I'm >> running >> the latest "stable" versions of just about everything... including gcc >> 3.2.3. > > Remove the offending declaration and replace it with an include of

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-30 Thread Dave Love
Jeff Boerio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I also have not been successful at all with HP-UX compiles (don't have > gcc 2.9x for HP). I haven't tried Solaris yet. The client side doesn't compile with recent versions of the proprietary compilers on Irix, Tru64 or Solaris. (It is C++, after all.)

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-30 Thread zt-vnc-list
> > Not quite equivalent if Tight is used together with JPEG, and > > there are photo-like images or gradients on the screen. ;-) > > Over a slow link, VNC will auto-select 6bpp (bits per pixel), in which case > ZRLE will match Tight even if Tight has JPEG enabled. I can confirm that they are de

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-30 Thread Constantin Kaplinsky
Hello James, > "JWW" == "James ''Wez'' Weatherall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JWW> Scott, Your notes omit to mention the ZRLE encoding, which JWW> provides equivalent compression over slow links to the Tight JWW> encoding. :) Not quite equivalent if Tight is used together with JPEG, and the

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-30 Thread James ''Wez'' Weatherall
> JWW> Scott, Your notes omit to mention the ZRLE encoding, > which provides > JWW> equivalent compression over slow links to the Tight encoding. :) > > Not quite equivalent if Tight is used together with JPEG, and > there are photo-like images or gradients on the screen. ;-) Over a slow link,

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-30 Thread James ''Wez'' Weatherall
Scott, Your notes omit to mention the ZRLE encoding, which provides equivalent compression over slow links to the Tight encoding. :) Cheers, -- Dr. James "Wez" Weatherall RealVNC Ltd. - http://www.realvnc.com - The Home of VNC -- As William suggests...please feel free to post any answe

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-29 Thread Jeff Boerio
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 13:48, Mike Miller wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote: > > > Li, Charles said: > > > What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc? > > > Which is better? > > > > What is the difference between blue and red? > > They are that different now? blue and re

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-29 Thread Jeff Boerio
I have gotten the sources to build on Red Hat 7.1 for both Pentium and Itanium platforms. gcc 2.96 is what I used successfully for both. I was NOT able to do this with gcc 3.x and have reported the feedback to Real VNC. I also have not been successful at all with HP-UX compiles (don't have gcc

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-29 Thread Dave Love
Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm having compile problems with the unix sources on Gentoo 1.4. I'm running > the latest "stable" versions of just about everything... including gcc 3.2.3. Remove the offending declaration and replace it with an include of X11/extensions/XShm.h. I've

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-29 Thread William Hooper
Jerry McBride said: > I'm having compile problems with the unix sources on Gentoo 1.4. I'm > running > the latest "stable" versions of just about everything... including gcc > 3.2.3. > > The relavent error follows: > > spinner vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc # make [snip] > make[1]: Entering directory `/vnc4/vnc

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-29 Thread Scott C. Best
As William suggests...please feel free to post any answers your might have to FAQ's such as this one. I had a blurb on the site already about TightVNC.vs.RealVNC (and all of the other VNC versions I've heard about), but surely some could be amplified or clarified. Anyhow, the one a

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-29 Thread David West
Is there any doc for the applet yet? In particular, I'm trying to generate the html on-the-fly setting host, password, width, height etc. (preferably not using .vnc files on the vncservers) Thanks for giving this your attention, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-29 Thread Alexander Rau
I installed the new beta. My gnome session is not working anymore. Only get the grey X screen and nothing else. Here is my xstartup: unset SESSION_MANAGER exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc Amy suggestions? Thanks AR ___ VNC-List mailing list [EMA

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-29 Thread Rosier, Roland
and results in large jumps in position. Best Regards, Roland Rosier > -Original Message- > From: Rosier, Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 08:54 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3 > > > Hello all, > &

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-29 Thread "Beerse, Corné"
> -Original Message- > From: William Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Li, Charles said: > > What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc? > > Which is better? > > What is the difference between blue and red? > Which is better? I, as a user, see the next differences: RealVNC:

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-29 Thread Rosier, Roland
Hello all, Windows tooltips now seem to work in the VNC 4.0b3 release. Well done for such an excellent piece of software. Best regards, Roland Rosier > -Original Message- > From: James Weatherall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 20:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Su

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-28 Thread William Hooper
Mike Miller said: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote: > >> > Is there no information on the web that lists the differences? >> >> I doubt it. What's the point, there is no "competition" between them. > > It's not that they are competing to win a prize, but every user has to > make a choic

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-28 Thread Mike Miller
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote: > > Is there no information on the web that lists the differences? > > I doubt it. What's the point, there is no "competition" between them. It's not that they are competing to win a prize, but every user has to make a choice. A web page designed to he

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-28 Thread William Hooper
Mike Miller said: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote: > >> Li, Charles said: >> > What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc? >> > Which is better? >> >> What is the difference between blue and red? > > They are that different now? Just the first example to come to mind that didn

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-28 Thread Mike Miller
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote: > Li, Charles said: > > What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc? > > Which is better? > > What is the difference between blue and red? They are that different now? > Sorry to make the point that way, but that is basically what you are > ask

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-28 Thread William Hooper
Li, Charles said: > What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc? > Which is better? What is the difference between blue and red? Which is better? Sorry to make the point that way, but that is basically what you are asking. Try both TightVNC and RealVNC and use the one that fits best in y

RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3

2003-07-28 Thread Li, Charles
What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc? Which is better? -Original Message- From: James Weatherall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VNC 4.0 Beta 3 RealVNC is pleased to announce the first public beta release of VNC