ranslation routines in the operating system.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sood, Sanjeev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 September 2005 19:49
> To: James Weatherall; vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Subject: RE: RFB Protocol related question
>
>
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 10:38 AM
To: Sood, Sanjeev; vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: RFB Protocol related question
Sanjeev,
As I stated in my previous mail, no, your assumption is incorrect.
Viewers
can request any format they wish, and some do take advantage of
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sood, Sanjeev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 September 2005 17:55
> To: James Weatherall; vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Subject: RE: RFB Protocol related question
>
> Hello James,
>
> Thanks for your response. So what you are saying is that
Weatherall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:28 AM
To: Sood, Sanjeev; vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: RFB Protocol related question
Sanjeev,
Yes, viewers can request pixel formats that are "larger" than the
server's
pixel format. i.e. a viewer on a 32
PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sood, Sanjeev
> Sent: 21 September 2005 02:46
> To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Subject: RFB Protocol related question
>
> We are implementing VNC server on an embedded platform and
> are using the
> latest RFB protocol spe
We are implementing VNC server on an embedded platform and are using the
latest RFB protocol spec (version 3.8, Dated 8 July 2005). I have an
implementation related question which I am not sure of from the spec:
* Spec allows client to change the pixel format and requires
servers to support
