Rex Dieter wrote:
If the GPL doesn't cover this case, then I have to say that the GPL is
weaker than I thought... and could be abused.
Abuse is what the GPL is supposed to prevent, I aggree.
The thing to remember here is that the original copyright holder is a
special case.
The wording we're d
Kyle McDonald wrote:
> A specfile is a convience. Not a requirement. Automating the RPM
> building also is a convience and a bonus, Not a requirement.
If one distributes GPL binary rpms, then the sources and scripts used to
generate it should be provided too. I considered that a requirement of t
