So if it were me operating whoever your provider is, I would take the
diversion as the originating number of the leg in question and bill
appropriately, as the PAI/FROM in this case is display only.
That being said, does the provider youre with make a distinction between
local/LD? thats relati
If you show nothing , I wonder how they'd bill you. Or if you edit from to
a number within that area code, what then?
I'm assuming larger carriers would want something constant.
Aryn Nakaoka
808.356.2901
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 11:04 AM Joe Aponick wrote:
> Does this provider have anything to
Does this provider have anything to say about the SIP privacy headers,
P-Asserted-Identity and/or Remote-Party-ID? Those are typically preferred for
routing/billing purposes whereas From is typically preferred for display.
You might be able to keep the original caller in the From header, and se
That's an interesting question, and I think/hope several people on here
will have answers. One thing I can say is that there may be legal issues
requiring that behavior, to avoid "toll diversion." In our case we only
sell flat-rate minutes so our customers don't see that detail.
On Thu, Sep 20,
Hello voice-ops:
Enterprise admin here.
We just converted from ISDN to SIP (and changed providers) and we're seeing
some undesirable billing behavior. I'm hoping I can get some objective
feedback from different providers.
If a call comes into our system, and we forward it off-net using the SIP
