Re: [VoiceOps] Carriers Keeping Acquired Defunct Company Names

2021-10-24 Thread Ryan Finnesey
Why would a company want to be both an ILEC and CLEC in the same area? From: VoiceOps On Behalf Of Mike Johnston Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 3:16 PM To: VoiceOps Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Carriers Keeping Acquired Defunct Company Names I see situations up here in Minnesota where it appears

Re: [VoiceOps] Carriers Keeping Acquired Defunct Company Names

2021-10-24 Thread Nicholas Sten
To add to Brooks’ clarification, back in 2010-2011, O1 Communications sold the entirety of their Small to Medium Enterprise portion (including customers, leased lines, much of the networking infrastructure, the data center at 1515K Street, and other various assets) to TelePacific. O1 retained th

Re: [VoiceOps] Carriers Keeping Acquired Defunct Company Names

2021-10-24 Thread Mike Johnston
I see situations up here in Minnesota where it appears that CenturyLink is essentially CLECing themselves.  An simple example would be Warroad, MN. https://www.telcodata.us/search-area-code-exchange-by-ratecenter-state?ratecenter=WARROAD&state=MN CENTURYTEL OF MINNESOTA, INC. (CenturyLink, Inc) O

Re: [VoiceOps] Carriers Keeping Acquired Defunct Company Names

2021-10-24 Thread Mark R Lindsey, ECG
My understanding is that this is all about the administrative friction of transfers and re-registrations. Once you’re registered with the FCC, state Public Utilities Commissions, local authorities for access to right of way and pole access, name changes and transfers can be complex. Then there are

Re: [VoiceOps] Carriers Keeping Acquired Defunct Company Names

2021-10-24 Thread Jay Taylor
Qwest was on the ball back in the day and got one of the few single letter domain names. Centurylink now controls q.com and qwest was putting customer email addresses on that domain. I don't know if Centurylink is still using that domain for customers anymore. Jay -Original Message