Re: [VoiceOps] Issues to T-Mobile

2023-01-11 Thread Pinchas Neiman via VoiceOps
I had some termination issues with random cell phone carriers, some where 608d other where 200d but really the phone didn't ring. (a rate of 60% of calls was like this) After collecting a few samples, and complaining to my upstream carrier, they had been improved immediately) On Wed, Jan 11, 2023

Re: [VoiceOps] Issues to T-Mobile

2023-01-11 Thread Calvin E. via VoiceOps
Check the 608 responses for a Call-Info header. If present, it should contain a point of contact for redress. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8688.html#section-3.1-3 "If there is a Call-Info header field, it MUST have the "purpose" parameter of "jwscard". The value of the Call-Info header field

Re: [VoiceOps] Issues to T-Mobile

2023-01-11 Thread Karl Douthit via VoiceOps
Welcome to the wide world of random call blocking. We've been seeing the same issue for some time now due to the magic of "analytics". Emergency notification calls (school closures, weather events, shootings) are especially great when getting blocked due to random systems deciding that they don't

Re: [VoiceOps] test

2023-01-11 Thread Mike Johnston via VoiceOps
DNS test looks good. ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

[VoiceOps] Issues to T-Mobile

2023-01-11 Thread Dovid Bender via VoiceOps
Hi All, We are a small ITSP and every so often we have issues with calls that go to T-Mobile. We sign all our calls with our cert. Lately we have been getting 404's, 608's etc through 382, Telnyx and SIPRoutes. Bandwidth has been worse than the rest as they don't outright reject calls but they sen

[VoiceOps] test

2023-01-11 Thread Hiers, David via VoiceOps
Test dns 1 ___ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops