at this point. I
> definitely cannot find OCNs assigned to Flowroute in Idaho, or even in
> their home state of Washington.
>
>
> -- Nathan
> ------
> *From:* VoiceOps on behalf of Erik
> Flournoy
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 9, 2017 9:37 PM
> *To:*
I ported a number to FlowRoute directly. Can't get any realer then
that.
Erik
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
> It's as real as fax is dead.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Alex Balashov
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 01:27:16PM -0800, Calvin Ellison
Colton are you an ITSP?
Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
> I'll expand.
>
> 1. Bandwidth can port most all numbers, but not all numbers are Tier 1 or
> 5, which support SMS. Rural Maine is tough, and there was a small place in
> North Carolina we couldn't. Other than that, th
Google suggests the above product is actually called the
> Portico: http://www.citel.com/products/portico-tva/)
>
>
>
> -- Nathan
>
>
>
> *From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *Erik
> Flournoy
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 10, 2016 8:10 PM
> *
Hey,
Does anyone know of any remote nodes or mini PBX that can run Centrex
phones but essential connect to a PRI?
Thanks,
Erik F
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message, including any attachments from EESPRO.com - contain
information which is CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. The
inform
I've only used the SMS/800 portal several years ago to manage 8XX. Heck I
didn't even know there was an alternative.
Erik Flournoy
808-457-7000
301-218-7325
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message, including any attachments from EESPRO.com - contain
information which is CONFIDENT
Ok Ok I know this will ruffle some feathers on the board, but what's you
ladies and gents best onsite and cloud pbx system. Let me define cloud as a
UC or Software based switch running a non specific provider based
appliance. (meaning their sticker isn't on the outside of the box)
Best Freeware: A
Soon you will be able to connect with SIP just not now. Its not the
technology as we know but more the legal side trying to sort through making
money etc.
On May 1, 2016 12:06 PM, "Mary Lou Carey" wrote:
> I believe those are finished services so you wouldnt be able to route your
> own NXXs over
It is possible and they are able to do so. It's the legal and billing side
of the house that has them held up. But by end of year iVoIP will be the
way we all connect.
Erik F
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Kidd Filby wrote:
> Not that I have seen yet. I hear rumblings that a couple are loo
Hey since we're on this topic what's the average cost for SigTran and who
would you guys recommend? Who actually has SS7 and would be interested in
interconnecting.
On Apr 23, 2016 7:21 AM, "Kidd Filby" wrote:
> ABSOLUTELY
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Hiers, David wrote:
>
>> People
Jay,
At this time you still need to buy or interconnect with someone that has a
Gateway Service to the interconnected SMS/MMS players. I've played with
that URI but it's not activated or used by most switches today in NPAC
lookups. May be changing in the near future though. Near for Telecom is
def
Blackberry by far is still the ultimate business phone "Up to 15.2 days
UMTS standby time"
Erik Flournoy
808-426-4527
301-218-7325
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message, including any attachments from EESPRO.com - contain
information which is CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR LEGALLY PRIVI
"Sent from my BlackBerry."
Those are still out there
Erik Flournoy
808-426-4527
301-218-7325
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message, including any attachments from EESPRO.com - contain
information which is CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. The
information is intended only f
quest. I've ported for
multiple carriers in different Regions. Wireless is the easiest once you
have the databases established.
Erik Flournoy
808-426-4527
301-218-7325
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message, including any attachments from EESPRO.com - contain
information which is CONFID
When you're ready to start porting, ordering blocks, and setting up LRNs I
can assist you. There are a number if technical and legal things you have
to get in place. Its not difficult but it is surely costly and you want to
ensure not to miss a step.
Good luck
On Dec 15, 2015 1:25 PM, "Robert John
Can I get a count of how many folks have SPID? There is a process that some
major carriers that were once small used to do exactly what we are
describing. The routing issues happen all the time even if it's not a
reseller amongst CLECs, ILEC everyday even when NPAC says the number goes
to xyz the I
being sent? How do you know the
>> original caller is even a legitimate telco and not some telemarketer going
>> on a rampage connecting directly with everything? If you are getting
>> problematic (abusive, illegal) inbound calls, how do you look up that IP to
>> know who t
Using BGP VERY Broadly here just as a peering example is all not how it
actually routes.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> Even BGP is not a decentralised, democratic, peer-to-peer utopia. Routes
> are distributed down in a rather hierarchical fashion; effectively, an
> o
Paul
I think direct switch to switch would work great especially with IPv6.
There would have to be a list kinda like the SS7 list that is maintained
and updated but with the correct certificate exchanges it could work. You
would essentially have to keep your upstream provider happy. Unless of
cour
it's voice and use TDM only for faxing which I wish would disappear
for goodness sakes.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> On 12/05/2015 05:05 PM, Erik Flournoy wrote:
>
> If a packet transverses your entire network as a packet then it's never
>> a t
hange
their name so maybe they aren't so neutral like a data center BGP meeting
place.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> On 12/05/2015 05:01 PM, Erik Flournoy wrote:
>
> Your description of Inteliquent makes a lot of since. It's essential
>> how
TDM only stands for faxing and paying FCC fees. If a packet transverses
your entire network as a packet then it's never a toll charge. It's a
packet. This is why they are pressing hard to tax the internet more because
the voice money games are slowing decreasing. It's a data war now.
On Sat, Dec 5
Paul,
Your description of Inteliquent makes a lot of since. It's essential how
the internet was born via free interconnections at hub locations. Of course
you paid to get to the location but once you built your fiber or back then
copper path you just plugged in.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 11:55 AM,
but I see this only as more consolidation
> around the dinosaurs that created this convoluted market to begin with.
>
> -Paul
>
> On Dec 5, 2015, at 14:17, Erik Flournoy wrote:
>
> Aloha Group,
>
> I'm curious to know others thoughts on where they believe the tradi
What's Inteliquent's Position? PSTN 2.0 is a great way to describe the
upgraded regulation of a system that's not invented to be free to the
masses but more so profited by one large mass. I just can't wrap my head
around how the government supposedly broke up the bells years ago but for
the past ce
Aloha Group,
I'm curious to know others thoughts on where they believe the traditional
PSTN is going vs VOIP and VoLTE. Now that Iconnectiv will be administering
the LNP in the US I feel as though it's the best time to try and propose
new or more up to date solutions that allow smaller carriers to
I've had great success. Its all about the router and upload speeds. Faxing
well that issue is still a problem with some carriers on fiber. Clocking
and syncing always seem to be a problem.
On Dec 2, 2015 12:26 PM, "Anthony Orlando via VoiceOps" <
voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote:
> Is anyone having su
issue.
Erik Flournoy
808-426-4527
301-218-7325
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message, including any attachments from EESPRO.com - contain
information which is CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. The
information is intended only for the use of the individual named above and
may not be
Has anyone used Conexiant?
Erik Flournoy
808-457-7000
301-218-7325
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message, including any attachments from EESPRO.com - contain
information which is CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. The
information is intended only for the use of the individual named
Aloha,
What's everyone using for e911 ANI and transport?
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
1-800-FREE-411
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-800-FREE-411
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Feby Francis
wrote:
> Hello Group,
>
> Does anyone use any SIP based 411 provider ? We currently use TDM based
> and was thinking if we can move to SIP based 411 provider as the transport
> cost doesn't
31 matches
Mail list logo
