tage of a misconfiguration, maybe they typo-ed
> something similar and it happens to be your number, maybe you discovered
> the next unrepentant robocalling company.
>
> Paul Timmins
> Telecommunications Consultant
> Timmins Technologies, LLC / telcodata.us
> 248-379-7
r them? Are the calls for certain not
> valid or are you assuming so because they are your numbers?
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:58 AM Jeff Anderson via VoiceOps <
> voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote:
>
>> What is the recommended process to investigate inappropriately
What is the recommended process to investigate inappropriately stir/shaken
signed calls? We have had some calls terminate into our network with our
ANI but the call was not signed by us but instead a different provider
signing attestation B.
Thanks
___
V
If a SIP carrier wanted to support equal access, is there anything like a
SIP tandem provider that can accept any Carrier Identification Code (cic=)
and route to the appropriate LD carrier?
The TDM equivalent might be something like Neutral Tandem.
Thanks
_
have to pay for it.
> >
> > NECA 4
> > https://apps.fcc.gov/etfs/public/tariff.action?idTariff=99
> >
> > Local Calling Guide
> > https://localcallingguide.com/
> >
> > MARY LOU CAREY
> > BackUP Telecom Consulting
> > Office: 615-791-9969
>
Does anyone know of any commercial products that can determine if a call is
local?
The product would look at what is defined in the Tariff documents, not just
make the decision based on coordinates/distance between callers.
I am aware of iConnectiv's solution.
Thanks
Has the industry as a whole more or less settled on a particular
attestation level when marking a call as verified in the CNAM?
If my phone receives a call and it says verified does that mean the call
was at attestation 'A' only, or 'A' and 'B', any level of passing
attestation, etc.?
Thanks
