ion to the Jive platform.
> Is it based on opensource software, or what?
100% home-grown.
--
Simon Perreault
Director of Engineering, Platform | Jive Communications, Inc.
https://jive.com | +1 418 478 0989 ext. 1241 | sperrea...@jive.com
___
VoiceOps m
this very purpose:
https://jive.com/jive-view/
--
Simon Perreault
Director of Engineering, Platform | Jive Communications, Inc.
https://jive.com | +1 418 478 0989 ext. 1241 | sperrea...@jive.com
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.
ch longer than for UDP, which
allows keep-alives to be much less frequent, thus saving battery life.
But that is true of any kind of NAT. Hence my question about NAT64's
relevance to this discussion.
--
Simon Perreault
Director of Engineering, Platform | Jive Communications, Inc.
https://jive.com | +
Le 2017-07-18 à 09:51, Colton Conor a écrit :
> Most all wireless carrier do not assign public facing IPv4 addresses to
> the phone only IPv6.
What is the impact of this on UDP vs TCP?
--
Simon Perreault
Director of Engineering, Platform | Jive Communications, Inc.
https://jive.com | +1 4
Le 2015-11-03 00:04, Colton Conor a écrit :
> Let me rephrase. After reading so much on why Freeswitch was developed
> in the first place, I consider Freeswitch to be a more powerful and
> better media engine than what Asterisk is. So its not that I object to
> opensource in general, I just think
Le 2015-08-27 15:38, Brooks Bridges a écrit :
Our total requirement is 5000 channels, however I'm more than
willing to deploy multiple devices to reach this number as long as
the power and space requirements aren't horribly restrictive.
One can easily transcode 5000 729-711 channels in
Le 2015-08-27 16:00, Nenad Corbic a écrit :
In our experience.
The number of software trasncoding sessions on a decent size box (quad core
xeon) is about 300 to 500 sessions.
You guys need to update your experience. We do more than that on a
single *core*.
Simon
Le 2015-08-27 17:31, Alex Balashov a écrit :
Simon, I think you're under the impression that you're arguing
I was under the impression we were having a nice friendly chat! :)
with a
traditional ILEC blockhead/troglodyte who doesn't understand FOSS.
That's an understandable assumption given
Le 2015-08-27 17:00, Moises Silva a écrit :
I'm curious. Can you be more precise on what you mean exactly by generic
1U server? What matters mostly is the processor, not the rack unit, so
I'd be interested in hearing your experience with transcoding 5000 g729
to g711 channels.
I'm sorry, I
