'Reply-To' munging (was: Re:
9-8-8 dialing [...])
Odd recommendation. I've never been on a list with this behavior. (Or more
precisely, not since the 90s when bandwidth mattered and everyone was trying to
conserve it and reduce "fluff.) Since I'm on two other busy Mailman l
Odd recommendation. I've never been on a list with this behavior. (Or
more precisely, not since the 90s when bandwidth mattered and everyone was
trying to conserve it and reduce "fluff.) Since I'm on two other busy
Mailman lists that have the reply-to-list behavior, I can say I've seen it
work fi
Hi,
I’m not aware of any recent changes to the list config, but I’ll check.
The current “reply-to” behavior is the one generally recommended by the Mailman
docs, which warn of weird email client behavior if you mess around with it.
I’m not beyond messing around with it, just don’t want to make
