On 6/10/22 03:51, Brian Turnbow wrote:
On 2022-06-09 14:42, Peter Beckman wrote:
Maybe a better question: When providing SIP Trunk Failover as a
feature, what do customer accounts use more often -- per TN or everything?
Everything. It is rare for the customer to request different failover
On 2022-06-09 14:42, Peter Beckman wrote:
Maybe a better question: When providing SIP Trunk Failover as a feature,
what do customer accounts use more often -- per TN or everything?
Everything. It is rare for the customer to request different failover
behaviors for different DIDs. At least
Maybe a better question: When providing SIP Trunk Failover as a feature,
what do customer accounts use more often -- per TN or everything?
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022, Mike Johnston wrote:
I agree with Jay, it is very customer specific. We offer all varieties
of failover to meet their needs.
Some
I agree with Jay, it is very customer specific. We offer all varieties
of failover to meet their needs.
Some have multiple sites with us and want the entire trunk to failover
to a trunk at an alternate site. This requires the alternate site to be
prepared to accept all of the DIDs of the
On 6/8/22 19:13, Calvin Ellison wrote:
If your SIP trunk provider were to offer failover, would you prefer to
configure that failover per DID/TFN or for the entire SIP trunk?
Failover might include another number, an IVR, voicemail, a ring group,
another SIP trunk, a voice reject, or
If your SIP trunk provider were to offer failover, would you prefer to
configure that failover per DID/TFN or for the entire SIP trunk?
Failover might include another number, an IVR, voicemail, a ring group,
another SIP trunk, a voice reject, or something else.
Calvin Ellison
Systems
