As Einstein said when they told him about the atom bomb: oy veh.
Actually, after reading Steve Krivit's report I was expecting something
worse. The magazine cover and headlines are dreadful, and the article has
some ridiculous statements, but overall it is not too bad. As I said
yesterday, any
Here is one statement from the article that is certainly right, although
probably for the wrong reasons:
The DOE will only acknowledge that its decision to re-examine cold fusion
is in part based on national security concerns.
I would love to know who said that, and what they had in mind. I
Jed:
If other nations are quicker to develop new energy technology than the
U.S., then an entire system of economic and political balance may become
unstable. This would be a matter of national security just as much, if not
more threatening, than bombs. There is the slight possibility that in
Hey Jed.
You write:
Mark, for crying out loud, STOP SAYING THING LIKE THAT! It is terribly
annoying. You are missing the point! If you have a gadget that produces ZPE
energy, at any level, even a tiny fraction of a watt, all you need to do is
release it to the public in the form of
Jones Beene writes:
I see that Rothwell has suddenly become an expert on the automotive
ICE. Wonderful. I'm sure Ford, BMW, and GM should hire him to
adivse them before they waste any more of the millions they have put
into this effort.
Somehow, these lunatic harebrained engineers at Ford
Mark Goldes writes:
If you devoted a fraction of the excellent effort you have expended on cold
fusion to learning about cars running on hydrogen, you would find that many
excellent conversions have been done.
Yes, I am aware of that. I have read several books about hydrogen, and ICE.
A Toyota
Mark Goldes writes:
The Brady device is likely to be demonstrated in Europe, or South
Africa, if
not in the U.S., sometime later this summer.
What is the Brady device? Is there a web site, or description?
I personally expect a demonstration magnetic motor, requiring no external
input, that
I wrote:
I am quite sure that Mark Goldes is not qualified to select the best
company to develop a 20 kW ZPE generator. No one is qualified to make this
decision. No human being can understand the problem in enough detail or
predict the future that well.
To give a well-known concrete example
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton
Instead, it is about the dangers of *human* duplicity and deception.
Remember- in 2001, when the designers failed to 'mention' a key little
design-criterion in Hal 9000 to the astronauts? Hey, Hal was just
doing his job - the dirty
Regarding AC's work on 2001.
It would also be useful to remember that the movie, 2001, was as much
Kubrick's creation as it was Clark's novel. In certain on-line discussion
groups debates concerning Kubric versus Clark's hand in the making of the
movie have raged one and on, never really being
Brady had an American rep, namely Sterling Allen. Sterling broke off a few
months ago, as a result of several unpleasant disputes Brady has had with
investors and suppliers, having nothing, apparently, to do with the
technology.
Brady is actively trying to sell his invention for $500 million.
As one old enough to have seen 2001 in its first release (in a former
Cinerama theater), and having read following books by Clarke, and seen 2010
in its first release, and seen both again later, I can make the following
remarks.
I have forgotten whether Hal killed the hybernating crew first or
Jed wrote, following a familiar theme:
No one is qualified to make this
decision. No human being can understand the problem in enough detail or
predict the future that well.
To give a well-known concrete example that I have mentioned before, ATT
licensed hundreds of companies to make
-Original Message-
From: Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 2004 July 17 09:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...X...
For the second time, doesn't anyone find it odd that according to this
article nobody is attempting to license this allegedly
Jed is correct on this point:
retrofitting ICE engines to use LENR
would be economic folly.
The problem is that the characteristics
of any LENR process differ vastly from
the relatively tame process of combustion.
The caustic nature and the presence of voltage
gradients would turn current
On Friday 16 July 2004 12:14, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Here is one statement from the article that is certainly right, although
probably for the wrong reasons:
The DOE will only acknowledge that its decision to re-examine cold fusion
is in part based on national security concerns.
I would love
16 matches
Mail list logo
