At 10:07 PM 11/21/4, RC Macaulay wrote:
>Horace.. I mean't no reference to the vortex-L group, but rather to the many
>websites on liquid vortex and their magic claims.
No need to apologize. It was a joke. The smiley "8^)" indicated a joke.
Just my sense of humor.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
Horace.. I mean't no reference to the vortex-L group, but rather to the many
websites on liquid vortex and their magic claims.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: "Horace Heffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: Tantalizing/
At 9:03 PM 11/21/4, RC Macaulay wrote:
[snip]
>Setting aside the many wild and far out claims of many vortex buffs,...
I'm mystified. Anyone recall any wild or far out claims here lately? 8^)
Regards,
Horace Heffner
One need not be a atomic phycisist to enjoy this group.
The quest for CF continues. My work in liquid vortex mechanical technology
continues. It has been our premise that a liquid vortex is dynamically similar
to an atom.
My purpose in this post is to mention a test we
ran on a high speed p
I was hoping that someone from ICCF11 had a commment
about the Israeli company, Energetics Technologies,
mentioned in the article, or the presentation by
El-Boher, which apparently... at least McKubre thinks
is pretty near to having a commercial product.
This "someone" will. I spent quite a bit of
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 6:17 PM
Subject: WashingtonPost article
" The cold fusion guys can't brew a cup of tea,"
Cold fusion researchers may measure their net gains in milliwatts, but the
hot
A big thanks to Mitchell Swartz and P.J van Noorden for posting the article
in both HTML and text. This is some of the most exciting reading on the
subject in a while.
"Maybe there is something there, some funny reaction going on." Park
pauses, staring off for a moment. "If there is, I'll make an
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:50:58 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin Von Sparondonk posted about the resonance of hydrogen atoms.
>I'm wondering about where he got the numbers. Are there tables in the
>Handbook which give these frequencies?
The sizes are related to the wave
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:36:22 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>--- Horace Heffner wrote:
>
>> Would you please summarize or quote the significant
>> parts of this article?
>
>
>It appears to have been removed from their site. I
>guess they only keep these articles online for
For everybody who is interested I have just downloaded the Washington Post
article.
Greetings
Peter van Noorden
Warming Up to Cold Fusion
Peter Hagelstein is trying to revive hope for a future of clean,
inexhaustible, inexpensive energy. Fifteen years after the scientific
embarrassment of the cen
--- Horace Heffner wrote:
> Would you please summarize or quote the significant
> parts of this article?
It appears to have been removed from their site. I
guess they only keep these articles online for one
week and this was from last Sunday.
I was hoping that someone from ICCF11 had a commme
At 3:17 PM 11/20/4, Jones Beene wrote:
>And what about this company mentioned by McKubre,
>Energetics Technologies,which has received a millions
>in private support to research cold fusion and has
>achieved "startling results" ?
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A5496-2004Nov16.html
Jones Beene wrote:
>
> I think that we always "knew" that a minimally bound> Ps ion would "exist" for some (very fleeting) length> of time. After all, there is no reason for it not to> exist for a few picoseconds... but what we really have> been looking for, ultimately, is validation of a> lo
13 matches
Mail list logo
