umm, yes, in teh basic model of capitalism, corporations ARE beholden
to society. corps were not ALLOWED to exist in the good olde days of
capitalism like they do now, becuase it was KNOWN they would wrok this
way. a large corps ability to influence the market destroys the
essence of pure capital
This, I was asked by someone today, when discussing the apparent shortage
of oil and price escalation that appears to be related to supply/demand.
He referred to this snip:
1)
Oil >
Big Oil's obscene profits - Exxon Mobil, the world's largest
publicly traded oil company, announced a 32 percent
The average joe (which includes me) as no intuitive feel for a KwH.
Instead, the "Energizer Bunny" comes to mind.
How far could an "Energized Car" travel on 10,000 AA batteries?
Harry
That's not even half new. I have papers from 8 years ago with the same
basic theory. The earliest papers date from 1988. Fusion Facts had
articles on this work back in the 1990's. The original idea comes from
the soviet dissident scientist Andrei Sakharov back in the 1960's. When
I argued in fa
- Original Message -
From: "Jed Rothwell"
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SzpakSevidenceof.pdf
And a surprise bit of history in the introif it is correct.
However, it is 'suspect' since an accelerator must have been
involved. If incorrect, statements like this cast doubt on what
f
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SzpakSevidenceof.pdf
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SzpakStheeffecto.pdf
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Seems to me that the greatest obstacle to going all out EV remains costs and
> adequate battery storage capacity.
Yup. Wasn't too long ago a Vort said all we need is a good battery.
Terry sez:
> Google says 2 to 4 miles per kWhr for "current" EVs. :-)
>
> You want air conditioning with that?
Of course!
> "Savvy Vort"? Oxymoron. Here's a web page that gives it to
> ya in all ways:
>
> http://www.accs.net/users/cefpearson/convers.htm
>
> In the interest of obfuscation,
By the way, I forgot to mention that the Prius produces five to 10 times
less pollution than standard / non-hybrid Toyota Corolla and other ICE-only
cars. (I mean emissions other than CO2.) The engine runs under optimal
conditions at all times; it has the very latest pollution control
equipment
Terry Blanton wrote:
Google says 2 to 4 miles per kWhr for "current" EVs.
Okay, so let's do some simple arithmetic. At $0.10 / kWh that's 2.5 to 5
cents per mile, versus 10 cents per mile for the average ICE car with
gasoline at $2.20 per gallon. Two to 4 times cheaper. And when gas hits $5
John Steck wrote:
BTW, has anyone else noticed the MPG on a standard / non-hybrid Toyota
Corolla? 30/38 mpg for automatic 32/41 mpg for manual. Not bad for
standard technology in a reasonably sized 4-door sedan IMO.
This is a good point. There are standard cars with excellent gas mileage.
I
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This brings up an important question that I hope some savvy veteran Vort will
> help educate me on:
Google says 2 to 4 miles per kWhr for "current" EVs. :-)
You want air conditioning with that?
"Savvy Vort"? Oxymoron. Here's a web page that gives it to ya in all
> > orionworks sez:
> Jed sez:
> > Granted, one really can't use the MPG rating when dealing
> > with an all-electrical vehicle. In that case it seems to
> > me that using a simple KwH rating might be an adequate
> > gage. How many miles can the car go on a single Kilowatt
> > hour. Again, just as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Granted, one really can't use the MPG rating when dealing with an
all-electrical vehicle. In that case it seems to me that using a simple
KwH rating might be an adequate gage. How many miles can the car go on a
single Kilowatt hour. Again, just as in MPG ratings, the h
Jones Sez:
> I suggest as an alternative measure - PQ or pollution
> quotient. Perhaps CPM, or Carbon (equivalent) per Mile
> would be less finger-pointing, but don't we need
> a "stick" as well as a carrot?
...
> http://www.sacunion.com/pages/state_capitol/articles/5749/
>
> That's the left-
Jones Beene wrote:
I suggest as an alternative measure - PQ or pollution quotient. Perhaps
CPM, or Carbon (equivalent) per Mile would be less finger-pointing, but
don't we need a "stick" as well as a carrot?
Actually, to be fair to rail and bus transportation, we should make the
units passen
- Original Message -
From: "Jed Rothwell"
> Ed Storms and others have objected to the
terminology "250 mpg" with > reference to plug in hybrid cars. It is
confusing and inaccurate.
I suggest as an alternative measure - PQ or
pollution quotient. Perhaps CPM, or Carbon (equivalen
A fellow petrophobe alerted me to the STAR-H2, Secure Transportable Autonomous
Reactor, a lead cooled water cracker:
http://www.hydrogen.anl.gov/publications.html
(last one.)
Ed Storms and others have objected to the terminology "250 mpg" with
reference to plug in hybrid cars. It is confusing and inaccurate.
I had the same reaction Ed did when I saw the term "250 mpg hybrid car" in
a New York Times op-ed column a couple of months ago. I thought: "That's
ridiculous.
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2005/08/16 Tue AM 10:14:33 EDT
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: vortex server
The escribe servers are frequently unavailable. The URL still resolves to an
IP address with our DNS.
Try again later.
> From: Harry Veeder
> This was posted on another list.
Thanks. Remy had sent this to me also. Seems the Eurekalert article is the
complete article. Sneaky of NS to try to get you to spring for $4.95 to read a
few extra paragraphs.
Terry Blanton wrote:
>
> Anyone have a Newscientist subscription to fetch the whole article?
>
> http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7844&feedId=online-news_rss20
>
This was posted on another list.
Harry
>> 13 August 2005
>>
>> From New Scientist Print Edition .
>>
>> Mark Anderson
From: "Terry Blanton"
These subjects have appeared on the list lately. Jones, maybe
neutron stars *are* n=1/137 hydrinos:
Excellent observation
Or going one step further, maybe there are two similar objects -
cosmic cousins so to speak
the "gamma burster" is (hydrino-based), but t
From: "John Harris"
Refering to Pages 3.501.205 & 3.558.149 it is fairly clear that
the centre
rod you refer to is the connection to one end of the cathode
grid This means the connections they are using now is from No
2 to No 4 to heat the cathode element. and as you said there is no
anod
Vo,
For those of us who lurk and may subscribe/unsubscribe but want to keep up
with what's gone, http://www.escribe.com/science/vortex/ doesn't appear to
be working. Has the url changed?
R.
...
Website
http://luna.bton.ac.uk/~roc1
...
John Steck wrote:
All electric vehicles will not reduce pollution, just shift it out of
urban areas to more harmful types.
This is incorrect. All modern electric vehicles are far more fuel efficient
than pure ICE, and somewhat better than hybrid ICE. There are two reasons:
the initial genera
These subjects have appeared on the list lately. Jones, maybe neutron stars
*are* n=1/137 hydrinos:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/08/15/MNGUSE7QIA1.DTL
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The "oil filter" housing lead is the one I referenced in this thread.
There are also two other electrical connections at the base. One appears to
feed the "cathode" grid and the other seems to feed the center rod, what I
am c
In 1996 Haisch and Rueda published a ZPF explanation for intertial mass:
http://www.calphysics.org/haisch/mercury.html
They now say they have a similar explanation for gravitational mass:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-08/ns-ijv081005.php
"Rueda and Haisch argued that charged matte
> From: "John Harris"
> What is this "centre anode " part?
>
> From my limited understanding the W grid is a heated cathode and the
> Sputtered Copper housing is the Anode.
The "oil filter" housing lead is the one I referenced in this thread. There
are also two other electrical connections at
30 matches
Mail list logo
