Viktor Schauberger might agree with you. You might also consider Mr.
Grimer's Beta-atm list on Yahoo.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Inside out. Outside in. Perpetual change."
BTW, it *was* the lattice ions.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Monteverde
Yeah, that's what I was trying to say, mor
Paper published, "A reconciliation of Quantum physics and Special
Relativity"
http://www.wbabin.net/stats.htm
enjoy
Frank Znidarsic
Bill -
>There are no forces on the surface of a wing EXCEPT
>those of air pressure.
>
>If you disagree... then you need to explain in detail
>what these non-air-pressure forces are.
>
>But I already know the answer. It's simple: Pressure
>differentials explain 100% of the lifting for
Harry -
I did the vacuum experiment years ago so details are a little hazy, but
basically it was a jar with a small diameter (1/8" I.D. I think)tube
sticking through the lid. Inside the jar was a small airfoil section
made of modelling clay, suspended vertically with the tube pointing at
the front
Thanks for the tinyurl which sometimes results in funny codes:
"dzaft"?
If you're still into that sort of thing, Dr. Randall has been having a
go at Dr. Michael "Exopolitics" Salla lately.
http://www.kevinrandle.blogspot.com/
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks
I've included an
William Beaty wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Rick Monteverde wrote:
>
>> I don't believe the pressure differential is the full source of lift,
>
> There are no forces on the surface of a wing EXCEPT those of air pressure.
>
> If you disagree... then you need to explain in detail what these
> non
From: hohlrauml6d
> Not really. Just one of the flashbacks they always promised us.
>
> You might be happy to know that Bruce is back doing his first love,
> paleoentomology. Here's a very interesting work of his:
>
> http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/sunstar/Why02/why.htm
That is indeed delig
Not really. Just one of the flashbacks they always promised us.
You might be happy to know that Bruce is back doing his first love,
paleoentomology. Here's a very interesting work of his:
http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/sunstar/Why02/why.htm
He did a brief stint with Robert Bigelow's NIDS
From: Wesley Bruce
...
> I missed the whole show. I'm on the other side of the planet
> so a few hours of flame war goes unnoticed as I sleep. Sorry
> if I have caused any friction but I can't see that much
> excess heat in the war. ;-)
You've managed to keep your composure despite my underhand
> From: hohlrauml6d
>
> Have you hosted Dr. Bruce Cornet's works?
Very astute observation.
Yes, I did back in the 1990s - and for several years I might add.
I met Dr. Cornet at a convention where I attended some of his lectures and
slide shows. Back then I had just created my orionworks.com we
At 08:16 pm 06/12/2005 -0800, Bill Beaty wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
>> Almost I did the spoon-under-the-faucet
>> experiment and it is very persuasive.
> Watch out though, since water can support
> significant negative pressures.
> Or in other words, water in vacuum d
11 matches
Mail list logo
