[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(rePete?)
I don't think Mr. (Dr. {hon.}) Bearden understands all he knows. He has
two good ideas: "regauging" and "reverse-time (conjugate) waves".
Unfortunately, I'm still paying for the power company to oscillate my
electrons at 60 Hz. And all I hear are excuses f
At 01:35 pm 02/01/2006 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Frank.
>
>William (Bill) Lyne lives up at Lamy, New Mexico Southeast
>of Ed Storms' Santa Fe Abode. I csalled him this morning for a short chat
>and challenged him to join Vortex.. At age 67 he's seasoned enough.
>
>http://www.google.com/maps?q=Lamy,+NM+
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Mon, 02 Jan 2006 20:42:40
-0700:
Hi Ed,
[snip]
>Robin, you ignore the main problem associated with this phenomena. The
>NAE is unique and delicate. If the electrolyte is circulated, it will
>pick up impurities that will accelerate destruction of the catho
Robin, you ignore the main problem associated with this phenomena. The
NAE is unique and delicate. If the electrolyte is circulated, it will
pick up impurities that will accelerate destruction of the cathode. If
the gas is circulated, it also will pick up impurities that will react
with the
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Mon, 02 Jan 2006 14:11:30
-0700:
Hi,
>The only reason to use the electrolytic approach at this time is because
>this method creates the NAE on occasion. The other methods require the
>NAE to be created on purpose, which a few people have done without
>kno
I don't think Mr. (Dr. {hon.}) Bearden understands all he knows. He
has two good ideas: "regauging" and "reverse-time (conjugate) waves".
Unfortunately, I'm still paying for the power company to oscillate my
electrons at 60 Hz. And all I hear are excuses for the MEG.
He had one idea right a
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, William Beaty wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, thomas malloy wrote:
> > According to Reich, nanobacteria, or something similar, can be
> > produced by placing beach sand, previously heated to incandescence on
> > sterile growth medium, in a orgone accumulator. Perhaps this strate
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, William Beaty wrote:
> What if the blue glow from Al electrolysis CAN produce tanning; what if
> it's a source of "hard" shortwave UV radiation?
Separate topic: exotic biology. If the ultraviolet glow is from microbes,
then bactericides such as Sodium Azide or perhaps even c
(rePete?)
I don't think Mr. (Dr. {hon.}) Bearden understands all he knows. He has
two good ideas: "regauging" and "reverse-time (conjugate) waves".
Unfortunately, I'm still paying for the power company to oscillate my
electrons at 60 Hz. And all I hear are excuses for the MEG.
He had one i
The only reason to use the electrolytic approach at this time is because
this method creates the NAE on occasion. The other methods require the
NAE to be created on purpose, which a few people have done without
knowing how. However, once the NAE can be created in large amounts, what
would be t
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Mon, 02 Jan 2006 11:35:11
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>The problem with a wet cell is that material is continuously being
>transferred from the anode to the cathode, and Li is slowly dissolving
>in the cathode. This can not be prevented. These changes will
>eventua
Interesting biography and GE research lab history.
http://www.harvardsquarelibrary.org/unitarians/coolidge.html
"The only person ever elected in his lifetime to the National Inventor's Hall of Fame lived for 102 years."
National Academy of Sciences Memorial Biography
By C. G. SUITS Director
The problem with a wet cell is that material is continuously being
transferred from the anode to the cathode, and Li is slowly dissolving
in the cathode. This can not be prevented. These changes will
eventually destroy the NAE. In addition, the higher the temperature,
the faster these reactio
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
OK, I can't really argue with that, beyond
saying such calculations are useful for showing
exactly what you just said: wet cells operate at too low a temperature.
I do not know any reason why a wet cell could not
be pressurized to operate at 200 or 300°C. This
wo
You got me on that, Stephen. When you try to interpret Tom Bearden
it could be ELLIOT NESS or LOCH NESS. :-)
Fred
> [Original Message]
> From: Stephen A. Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: vortex-l
> Date: 1/2/2006 9:41:50 AM
> Subject: Re: OCCULT ETHER PHYSICS vs BE
I found this totally opaque. Is it possible to shed a little light on
it in a few words?
Frederick Sparber wrote:
Tom Bearden Sez.
"The point is that any charge produces a continuous flow of real,
usable EM energy from the vacuum.
Say what? What is he talking about here?
The field of
Edmund Storms wrote:
Stephen, I would like to suggest that the electrolytic cell will never
be used to make commercial heat because it operates at too low a
temperature and is not stable. Commercial application will, I predict,
involve gas loading. Consequently, such calculations have no us
In C.G. (Guy) Suits' 1930s experiments with hydrogen arcs he
noted that "even at atmospheric pressure the arc had an extremely
small cross section. It was, in fact, no larger than an arc in a nitrogen
atmosphere subjected to pressures greater than 1500 pounds per
square inch. ("a 10 ampere arc
Tom Bearden Sez.
"The point is that any charge produces a continuous flow of real, usable EM energy from the vacuum. Thermodynamically we are describing a nonequilibrium steady-state (NESS) system, and such a system is permitted to continuously emit energy (received from its environment). T
The CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics gives the H - H bond energy of 498,000
Joules per mole (119,000 cal/gram mole) or 472 BTU/gram mole.
Conspiracy, Frank? :-)
Fred
http://www.cheniere.org/misc/a_h%20reaction.htm
" 109,000 cal./gram mole equals 432.6 BTU/gram mole--- roughly the he
20 matches
Mail list logo
