Robin,
The paper is too large to scan, but if you provide a snail mail address, we
will mail a copy.
The Laumann NASA Patent is # 4,112,875.
Mark
From: Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: The Pappajo engine
Date: Tue, 0
In reply to Mark Goldes's message of Mon, 08 May 2006 09:22:13
-0700:
Hi Mark,
[snip]
I am very interested.
>was Performance of a Hydrogen-Oxygen-Noble Gas Engine. A copy is in our
>files.
Does the paper mention the patent number? Is it a paper "paper",
or in electronic form? If the latter,
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_particles
Dudes...apparently there is a hypothetical particle named Oh-My-God.
Like...Oh-My-God! That is like so cool and weird at the same time. ;-)
Harry
I abject disbelief, I had to look for myself.
I'm at a loss for words.
s
At 07:38 AM 5/8/2006, you wrote:
Steve:
RE: any benefits to society from collider research...
Perhaps the fact that there were NO serious answers to your question, is
the answer!
:-)
And taking the implication a little further, perhaps it's a good source
of amusement!
:-):-)
Anybody know a g
http://solarcooking.org/
If he has a favorite design, happy to quote on it -john
-Original Message-
From: William Beaty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 5:40 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Solar cooker?
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri,
As is typical for UK websites here's an excellent article on batteries
with pictures. They're not stingy with good information. :-)
http://www.doitpoms.ac.uk/tlplib/batteries/printall.php
Despite the low current attainable with 12 volts applied
to the cell the approximately 0.6 square mete
Jones,
There was a remarkable engine developed at JPL by E.A Laumann, about 1976,
that ran on Hydrogen and Argon. I'm pretty sure it was patented by NASA.
As I recall, the efficiency exceeded that possible with fuel cells. It was
a reinforced diesel with unusually high compression
A paper
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_particles
>
Dudes...apparently there is a hypothetical particle named Oh-My-God.
Like...Oh-My-God! That is like so cool and weird at the same time. ;-)
Harry
Steve:
RE: any benefits to society from collider research...
Perhaps the fact that there were NO serious answers to your question, is
the answer!
:-)
And taking the implication a little further, perhaps it's a good source
of amusement!
:-):-)
Mark N. Iverson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original M
Howdy Steven,
Ah! Stanford,
Yes ! It is housed in the huge building the size of the domed stadium.
Seems they were actually working on a death ray gun and /or super rail gun
rather than for the pure love of science.Funny thing is that 4 grad students
duplicated the process using a series of ta
Some info on Three-Photon Electron-Positron annihilation.
http://www.am.qub.ac.uk/users/g.gribakin/papers/PRL163202.pdf
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Sparber
To: vortex-l
Sent: 5/8/2006 6:00:22 AM
Subject: Re: Electronium Hydride
Fills the bill for Positronium and WIMPS
Fills the bill for Positronium and WIMPS (Neutralinos?) too.
http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/search_positronium.html
"How much positronium? In the Milky Way bulge, about 15 billion (thousand million) tons of positrons are annihilated every second.
That's as much mass as the electrons
Coincidentally, I saw one of these mythical accelerators firsthand (well,
from the 280 freeway) a few weeks ago when I was driving by Stanford.
Pretty cool looking high tech thing.
13 matches
Mail list logo
