Ah but this is different, for fire prevention you are concerned about Joule
heating of the wire, this is resistive heating by definition, so what matters
is current in the wire. The load could be perfectly reactive ie consume 0 W and
still provoke Joule heating of the wire.
So wire size depends
In reply to jonfli's message of Tue, 6 Jun 2006 10:18:22 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Since I'm not involved in any type of plasma electrolysis and the
[snip]
>Also, please correct me if I'm wrong, but the typical electrolysis cells
>appear to be most nearly "resistive" relative to their waveforms with ve
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Wed, 7 Jun 2006 00:44:44
+0200:
Hi Michel,
[snip]
>0.5E-10 x 1/200 = 0.25E-12 = 250E-15, OK but may I suggest fm rather than "F"
>(symbol for Farad)
...also the symbol for Fermi ( 1E-15 m).
>
>I recall reading that muon catalyzed fusion couldn't produce e
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian
Also there is no such thing as reactive heating, by definition.
<><><><><><>
Thank you. I appreciate hearing the voice of sanity. The NFPA has
insisted that KVA be used in calculating the conductor size for the NEC
in lieu of KW. Absolute
Robin wrote:
...
> Precisely. Outside the orbit of the shrunken electron, the Hydrino
> is a neutral entity. In that respect it somewhat resembles a fat
> neutron. However when tunneling into another nucleus, the shrunken
> electron would usually be left behind, so the actual reaction
> would be a
"The Law of Electric Circuit", hilarious :)
"...without this law it is impossible...", when you have no imagination that
is, or when you have too much maybe?
Never trust someone who makes up an ad hoc law of electricity to measure input
power in an excess heat device :)
Also there is no such t
The following has been gleaned from multiple (surprisingly consistent)
sources - I've pointed out where there are differences of opinion. I'm
sorry that it's not strictly narrative, but hopefully I've covered most of
the ground.
The aims of JC water pretreatment are getting the stuff that we don'
i was almost tempted to make a road trip of it until you said orem. i hit a cow on a road trip in 96 about a mile south of there, pulled into town, stayed the night at a hotel, informed the local authorities about it, and was arrested for not reporting the collision at the time (1 am...)
yeah
Jones Beene wrote.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Frederick Sparber"
>
> > giving room for possibly heavier (* e-) particles than Ps-
> > (Electronium) like 1864 or 3727 eV or so? The 53 MeV/c
> > calculates to about 1.98 times electron rest mass. CRC gives the
> > Muon mass as 105
Since Jones has been black listed by "someone":
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/05/31/what_are_those_words/
___
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com
The annual SSE conference is coming up. It's not to late to jump in a
plane and go to Salt Lake City by thursday morning. (From Seattle a
ticket is around $350, so I'm tempted myself.)
Actually, the conference is about 45min south of Salt Lake City, at
the Utah Valley State College in Orem.
- Original Message -
From: "Frederick Sparber"
giving room for possibly heavier (* e-) particles than Ps-
(Electronium) like 1864 or 3727 eV or so? The 53 MeV/c
calculates to about 1.98 times electron rest mass. CRC gives the
Muon mass as 105.65837 +/- 0.34 MeV
The 1864 or 37
It was a Panda in the book:
http://tinyurl.com/zhobo
Busted !
Jones.
I wrote:
>
> Yes, And Two possible end of Muon Decay Paths according to my 1991-1992
CRC
> are e- ( neutrino e) (neutrino u) e+ e- and (e- e+ e-) with 53 Mev/c
giving
> room for possibly heavier (* e-) particles than Ps- (Electronium) like
> 1864 or 3727 eV or so?
The 53 MeV/c calculates t
The MIBs have attacked again:
http://pesn.com/2006/06/02/9500276_Water_fuel_experimenter_threatened/
http://tinyurl.com/ncu58
Water Fuel Experimenter and Team Threatened
Ken Rasmussen's research team has been working on a process that turns
out to have similarities to the super-efficient elect
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
The owner pulls out his pocket dictionary and looks up koala. It say,
"Marsupial. Eats shoots and leaves".
<><><><><><>
It was a Panda in the book:
http://tinyurl.com/zhobo
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1592400876/002-7756518-1567225?v=gl
Michel Jullian wrote:
> The name is Jullian with an "a".
Sorry, too much watermelon.
> If by "incomptent" you mean "doesn't compute
> well" yes that's what I "seemed to imply" ;-)
>
> BTW the fact that power is not equal to Iav*Vav in the general case (I'll let
> you find an obvious example whe
Jones Beene wrote:
>
> To clarify:
>
> > As posted a few months ago, the heavy isotope of oxygen: O-18
> > (18O) is far more ubiquitous in nature than many realize. It is
> > 15 time more prevalent in natural water than is deuterium, for
> > instance but the interesting part is that it is enric
Jones,
This triggered the best laugh I've had in awhile!
Hilarious.
The book for writers with that wonderful title is always on my wife's
desk...
Mark
From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
To:
Subject: Re: Two clean reactions
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:26:09
Since I'm not involved in any type of plasma electrolysis and the
measurement of the resultant waveforms, I thought I would research various
techniques by those that do. Below are quotes from a document titled " The
Law of Electric Circuit" by Ph. M. Kanarev.
"It appears from the analysis that
To clarify:
As posted a few months ago, the heavy isotope of oxygen: O-18
(18O) is far more ubiquitous in nature than many realize. It is
15 time more prevalent in natural water than is deuterium, for
instance but the interesting part is that it is eneriched
naturally in biological life (osm
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/06/tesla_motors_cl.html
Tesla Motors Closes $40M Round; Funding to Support Launch of Electric
Sportscar
1 June 2006
Tesla Motors announced the completion of its $40 million Series C
financing led by VantagePoint Venture Partners, one of the largest
Clean
- Original Message -
From: "Robin van Spaandonk"
however probably more likely is:-
Hy2 + O18 -> O16 + He4 + 16 MeV
Sodden thought: this reaction in the context of the WasserCar.
As posted a few months ago, the heavy isotope of oxygen: O-18
(18O) is far more ubiquitous in natur
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:05:58
+0200:
Hi,
BTW, previously I wrote:-
[snip]
>> Hy2 + O18 -> C12 + 2 He4 + 9 MeV
[snip]
however probably more likely is:-
Hy2 + O18 -> O16 + He4 + 16 MeV
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
Compet
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Battery shapes
So is Naudin incomptent when it comes to calculating power output? (That
is
what Michel Jullien seem to imply.)
I haven't followed this thread closely. In looking at other of Naudin's
expe
Walter Faxon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Who
> will be the first to gain access to superintelligent machines (or
> superintelligent meat or whatever), however they come to be? People with
> money and power, probably via governments. Organized religious fanatics.
>
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
However, would it be helpful in the current context for me to
provide a summary of the various (yes, there are more than one)
water pre-treatment regimes proposed for the JC? The techniques
are a tad more involved than Jones has previous
- Original Message -
From: "Michel Jullian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Battery shapes
> the instrument will calculate
the instantnaeous power for each sample and integrate ***not average***
them
to a true power measurement.
They integrate over a time interval to get total en
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:05:58
+0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hi Robin, I am not familiar with hydrino fusion concepts, any pointers welcome.
>
>The idea is that the hydrino nucleus (proton) can approach the target nucleus
>close enough for fusion thanks to the screening eff
> Fred wrote:
>
> Build around (shield) your Hydroxide Hydrate negative ion
> OH(H2O)-
> with H3O+ and these water clusters,Jones. :-)
I am sufficiently intrigued to see where Fred and Jones go with this to suggest
that I hold fire on posting any alternative JC theories for now, lest they
prov
Build around (shield) your Hydroxide Hydrate negative ion OH(H2O)-
with H3O+ and these water clusters,Jones. :-)
Water Clusters Article:
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/98/19/10533
Trimer Pix:
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/98/19/10533/F5
Pentamer Pix:
http://www.pnas.
The name is Jullian with an "a". If by "incomptent" you mean "doesn't compute
well" yes that's what I "seemed to imply" ;-)
BTW the fact that power is not equal to Iav*Vav in the general case (I'll let
you find an obvious example where P is not zero whereas Iav or Vav is null,
which would make
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/98/19/10533
"Water clusters: Untangling the mysteries of the liquid, one molecule at a time "
Abstract of Article:
"Extensive terahertz laser vibration-rotation-tunneling spectra and mid-IR laser spectra have been compiled for several isotopomers of small
Hi Robin, I am not familiar with hydrino fusion concepts, any pointers welcome.
The idea is that the hydrino nucleus (proton) can approach the target nucleus
close enough for fusion thanks to the screening effect of it's closely orbiting
electron?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Ro
Hi,
If we ever get to the point where we can make hydrinos small
enough, (or collect small ones), then here are two nice clean
fusion reactions based upon plentiful materials:-
Hy + N15 -> C12 + He4 + 4.96 MeV
(this is essentially the last step of the CNO reaction). The N15
isotope would need to
35 matches
Mail list logo
