-Original Message-
From: Hoyt A. Stearns jr.
http://www.stevequayle.com/dead_scientists/UpdatedDeadScientists.html
<><><><><><>
It must simply have been "their time".
Terry, gnostically speakin'
___
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtu
http://www.stevequayle.com/dead_scientists/UpdatedDeadScientists.html
Hoyt Stearns
Scottsdale, Arizona US
http://members.cox.net/hoyt-stearns
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 4:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: hohlrauml6d
Of course all this could be coincidence, unless you're a Jungian. Or a
gnostic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistis_Sophia
}:-)
<><><><><><>
Samuel H. Clemens:
"I was sorry to have my name mentioned as one of the great authors,
because
-Original Message-
From: Grimer
Err...I know of two - Mallove and Meyer - Can you name any others?
I'm not being sarcastic. I would really like to know. There might
be a chance that one day I could earn the red badge of martyrdom. 8-)
<><><><><>
Of course all this could be coincidenc
-Original Message-
From: Grimer
Err...I know of two - Mallove and Meyer - Can you name any others?
I'm not being sarcastic. I would really like to know. There might
be a chance that one day I could earn the red badge of martyrdom. 8-)
<><><><><>
What really got me wondering at first
-Original Message-
From: Grimer
Err...I know of two - Mallove and Meyer - Can you name any others?
I'm not being sarcastic. I would really like to know. There might
be a chance that one day I could earn the red badge of martyrdom. 8-)
<><><><><>
But it's not just FE researchers. Wha
-Original Message-
From: Grimer
Err...I know of two - Mallove and Meyer - Can you name any others?
I'm not being sarcastic. I would really like to know. There might
be a chance that one day I could earn the red badge of martyrdom. 8-)
<><><><><><>
And you and I have spoken on the GEC
-Original Message-
From: Grimer
Err...I know of two - Mallove and Meyer - Can you name any others?
I'm not being sarcastic. I would really like to know. There might
be a chance that one day I could earn the red badge of martyrdom. 8-)
<><><><><>
Of course Brude DePalma did himself in
-Original Message-
From: Grimer
Err...I know of two - Mallove and Meyer - Can you name any others?
I'm not being sarcastic. I would really like to know. There might
be a chance that one day I could earn the red badge of martyrdom. 8-)
<><><><><><>
Then there was Marinov:
http://www.p
-Original Message-
From: Grimer
Err...I know of two - Mallove and Meyer - Can you name any others?
I'm not being sarcastic. I would really like to know. There might
be a chance that one day I could earn the red badge of martyrdom. 8-)
<><><><><><>
Here's a post by an astute individual
Howdy Kyle,
Gosh! Golly! Gee! Kyle.. sometimes important discussion takes place when
Vorts congregate.. sometimes very serious stuff is mentioned.. a little of Parks
helps to remind us we are all human and in need.
Some humor permeates the discussion.. perhaps as a way to keep from crying
w
Posted Earlier:
>
> Whether opting for regular electron or Electronium (*e-) fractional
> orbit hydrinos the orbital velocity limit [n(c*alpha)]*2 should be such
> that a relativistic mass increase (gamma = [E kinetic/mc^2] + 1)
> is less than 1% or about 5 KeV or less. Where E kinetic = (n*13
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:35:49 -0700 Jones Beene wrote:
> In a curious coincidence (returning for a moment
> to the even more scandalous subject of vehicles
> powered by so-called WaterFuel), my source tells
> me that the "fuel grade" of preconditioned water
> he uses is "thick like syrup" after
Michel Jullian wrote:
>
>
> Fred wrote:
> ...
> >> > The potential V of a `particle with charge - q at a distance r
> >> > from a particle with charge + q equals V = k*q/r independent
> >> > of the mass of eithe
I am beginning to find the tone and/or subject matters of recent postings
disturbing. And not only of this particular thread.
Will someone please explain what has happened to vortex in the past few
years? It is not the same. If its not clear what I am saying, I will
elaborate, but prepare y
Jones wrote,
99 of that hundred myths are mostly BS but is the 'original' true - or
just one of A.C. Greene's "Chance Encounters: True Stories of Unforeseen
Meetings, With Unanticipated Results"
Howdy Jones,
You do Texas an injustice 'cause 'round here it's 100% BS. If you don't
believe it ju
A. C. Greene is a locally-famous historian of everything-Texan.
'Locally famous' is the next step above "a legend in his own
mind," but A.C. can write. For instance, on Amazon you can find
"Chance Encounters: True Stories of Unforeseen Meetings, With
Unanticipated Results"
...or "Texas Sketc
Grimer wrote:
> At 02:09 pm 09/06/2006 -0700, you wrote:
>> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Akira Kawasaki)
>
>> 4. LIONS: WHY CERTAIN RELIGIOUS CONVICTIONS GAIN FEW FOLLOWERS.
>> According to a Reuters story out of Kiev, on Sunday evening when
>> the zoo was crowded with visitors, a man lowered himself
Fred wrote:
...
>> > The potential V of a `particle with charge - q at a distance r
>> > from a particle with charge + q equals V = k*q/r independent
>> > of the mass of either particle. k = 1/4(pi)eo
...
>> > The velocity v = [2 V*q/r * (1/m)]^1/2 = [2 V*q/r (1/2m)]^1/2 at that
>> > point is
Please Mark there are more adequate places for OS wars I am sure. I understand
your point of view I used to be a MacOS fan myself but I don't care much about
the OS I use any more, they all look so much the same now.
Thanks for the info on Bill's backlog, we may get his answer re the [Vo] tag in
At 07:33 am 10/06/2006 -0600, Fred wrote:
>I think isolation/separation of hydrogen from the water molecule/molecules
>is unnecessary in order to get the energy release at hydrino formation.
>>
>> A proton (H+) should be able to enter into the electron cloud of
>> an atom and capture a high energy
At 07:27 am 10/06/2006 -0500, Richard wrote:
>Howdy Fred and Frank,
>
>Fence sitting can result in all sorts of strange results and has no place in
>Vorts where the wild and free fear no evil. We once were testing a "shape" for
>a distributor with a segment of a parabolic cut cavity. The inducti
At 06:24 am 10/06/2006 -0700, Mark wrote:
>And apparently Yahoo has recently begun to arbitrarily filter out
>a lot of legitimate messages as "spam", just as AOL has been
>politically censoring its incoming mail for over a year.
They have certainly buggered up the layout which has pissed me
Saturday, 10 June
7:00 AM - Watch England v Paraguay at Route 66 Brewery (inside Albuquerque Airport) - Live on KLUZ channel 41
Delta Flight
Leaves Albuquerque 8:30 AM
Arrives Atlanta 1:36 PM
Delta Flight
Leaves Atlanta 4:10 PM
Arrives Dusseldorf 7:25 AM (Sunday morning)
Oops. Some f
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 12:24:40PM +0200, Michel Jullian wrote:
>Thanks Mark for the nice recipe, but it won't work for
>Windows users,
Maybe if you read this you won't want to use Windows any more
(except for games and such that won't run under Linux and don't
have an equivalent there). Micros
My biggest question is why a topic Subject Header gets changed
so you can't follow a thread in the Archives? :-)
RC Macaulay
To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
6/10/2006 6:28:42 AM
Re: Fred's question
Is the enhanced engine performance on rainy-misty > days due to cooling >of the compression stoke
Is the enhanced engine performance on rainy-misty > days due
to cooling >of the compression stoke air > by vaporization of the
added water or is there> something in the water mist-droplets giving
> some free energy? >> Not noticeable on dry winter days,
but it is > when driving on snowy one
At 05:19 am 10/06/2006 -0600, Fred wrote:
> A pint of water replacing a barrel of oil
> isn't too hard to take.
>
> Unless you work for Enron. :-)
>
> Fred
Who wouldn't take it lying down. 8-(
Frank
At 01:41 pm 10/06/2006 +0200, you wrote:
> Frank, I may be wrong but I doubt this is the
> place for proselytism.
I agree with you. But since Pork's paragraph was a
sneer at religious belief in general, including mine,
I'm sure that you, like Voltaire, will defend to the
death my right of rep
Oops sorry I was unclear Fred but I am not leaving or calling for secession, I
was only wondering if we couldn't switch Vortex to possibly better mailing list
servers. Thanks for your kind words all the same!
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Frederick Sparber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Michel Jullian
>
> Thanks Mark for the nice recipe, but it won't work for Windows users, and
putting a tag in the subject line is a standard function in any mailing
list server I would think, can't this be done on eskimo.com lists Bill?
>
> Or maybe it's time to switch to Googlegroups or Yahoogrou
Frank, I may be wrong but I doubt this is the place for proselytism. For one
thing it may deeply hurt the feelings of fervent atheists amongst us :)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Grimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 7:33 AM
Subject: Re: FW: [BOBPARKS-WHATS
Whether opting for regular electron or Electronium (*e-) fractional
orbit hydrinos the orbital velocity limit [n(c*alpha)]*2 should be such
that a relativistic mass increase (gamma = [E kinetic/mc^2] + 1)
is less than 1% or about 5 KeV or less. Where E kinetic = (n*13.6)^2 for the
regular elec
Thanks Mark for the nice recipe, but it won't work for Windows users, and
putting a tag in the subject line is a standard function in any mailing list
server I would think, can't this be done on eskimo.com lists Bill?
Or maybe it's time to switch to Googlegroups or Yahoogroups?
Michel
- Or
Vorts,
Is anybody aware of an *authoritative* online discussion of Russell's
concept of 'negative electricity', as propounded (I believe) in his book
'The Universal One'?
Alternatively, if anyone is personally au fait with his theories, but
doesn't want to get into a public discussion, please fee
35 matches
Mail list logo
