On 9/17/06, Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In reply to John Berry's message of Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:29:05+1200:Hi,[snip]>> BTW I also suspect that it is real, because the measured mass>> change was +2 gm in one orientation, and -2 gm when turned upside
>> down. This is not the sort
In reply to John Berry's message of Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:29:05
+1200:
Hi,
[snip]
>> BTW I also suspect that it is real, because the measured mass
>> change was +2 gm in one orientation, and -2 gm when turned upside
>> down. This is not the sort of thing that results from measurement
>> error caused
On 9/17/06, Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In reply to John Berry's message of Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:10:37+1200:Hi,[snip]>> >No Kyle, your mistaken. You doubt KE = 1/2mv^2?>>>Not in anything other than reactionless propulsion.
Who says it's reactionless? Personally, I think it re
Indeed, it would seem that the hypothesized preferred frame would act as the
"road". Or the "air". There is another word that could be used, it startswith an "e" (or "ae") but I will remain a gentleman. :)I'm not so much of a gentleman then.
> But if you accept that Morton and ATGroup and especial
In reply to OrionWorks's message of Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:49:52
-0700:
Hi,
SN-AKOIL :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.
Hi,
Here's a variation on a theme. An atom may be seen as a small
spherical resonant chamber, with infinite Q, with EM energy in it.
In that respect it looks like one of these drive units, except
that it wouldn't develop any force because it is symmetrical.
If placed in a severely asymmetric inten
In reply to John Berry's message of Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:10:37
+1200:
Hi,
[snip]
>> >No Kyle, your mistaken.
>>
>> You doubt KE = 1/2mv^2?
>
>
>Not in anything other than reactionless propulsion.
Who says it's reactionless? Personally, I think it reacts against
space itself via the interaction tha
The Russian work first surfaced in the now defunct, very uneven, journal
published by Frolov in St. Petersburg. There was a picture of a
"transformator" in an issue back at least two years. Perhaps two or three
issues before the publication ran out of money and closed down. Frolov now
sells
- Original Message -
From: John Berry
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor
Not in anything other than reactionless propulsion.
But why make it a special case?
But you must assume that the reactionle
Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have these folks beat Goldes to the punch?
>
> http://www.akoil.ru/en/?PHPSESSID=73ea87b97edea4362eb8a48538ec1b70
>
> "02.09.2006. For the first time in the world on 2d of September, 2006
> the first electromagnetic transformers of electric energy
>No Kyle, your mistaken.You doubt KE = 1/2mv^2?Not in anything other than reactionless propulsion.
To postulate a scenario where a supposedreactionless engine consumes power at a rate based on an "absolute" velocity
and therefore obeys energy conservation I think is less mistaken than tosimply ass
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Can you try to calculate the balance?
My guess is that it is significantly below breakeven.
However... and you heard it first on Vortex...
...that may not be the case if one were to use a mix - say a 50-50
mix of H20
On 9/16/06, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My rad-meter is much more sensitive than the normal CD variety,
but the threshold is still close to 10,000 eV so a burst of x-rays
at that intensity signifies significant energy. Of course, it also
takes significant mechanical energy to inject t
Terry,
Re: Electric Ice
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/13sep_electricice.htm?list920094
.. your mention of frozen English peas has jogged the memory. Here
is an excerpt from the article.
[BTW don't the Brits call them French Peas?]
"In a thundercloud ... tiny ice crystals become
Have these folks beat Goldes to the punch?
http://www.akoil.ru/en/?PHPSESSID=73ea87b97edea4362eb8a48538ec1b70
"02.09.2006. For the first time in the world on 2d of September, 2006
the first electromagnetic transformers of electric energy were
produced and tested. These transformers make electric
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/13sep_electricice.htm?list920094
Electric Ice
09.13.2006
Sept. 13, 2006: Here's something fun to try in your kitchen: Go to the
freezer, open the door and pry loose an ice cube. Next, look around
the freezing compartment for some frost—the crystalline fuzz
The title of the post was "Autopia: Sergey and Larry's 100 mpg PHEV".
Was it the colon?
On 9/16/06, Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/14/technology/14google.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&ref=technology&pagewanted=print
http://tinyurl.com/m78u4
September 14, 2006
P
- Original Message -
From: John Berry
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor
No Kyle, your mistaken.
You doubt KE = 1/2mv^2? To postulate a scenario where a supposed
reactionless engine consumes powe
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/14/technology/14google.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&ref=technology&pagewanted=print
http://tinyurl.com/m78u4
September 14, 2006
Philanthropy Google's Way: Not the Usual
By KATIE HAFNER
SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 13 — The ambitious founders of Google, the
popular search engine c
Bob Park has strong views on the irrelevancy of manned space exploration.
Personally I'd much rather see my tax money spent on this than oil wars or
pointless welfare social engineering.
I'm not sure gov. bureaucrats really understand that they have the levers on
human self-improvement.
-Orig
20 matches
Mail list logo
