- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics
...
Good, then you do acknowledge there is *real work*
being done while two magnetic dipole
I expect that a diode array / lighting system with
appropriate control of internal and external diode arrays,
resistive heaters, and inside lamps would maintain the
culture pool of coral larva, algae, or metal gathering
microorganisms with the correct light at the correct
temperature
On 1/23/07, Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the motor is unloaded, it's own inertia should carry it past the sticky spot
if it is OU (assuming zero friction). This is because as it accelerates all the
energy is stored in the rotor as kinetic energy. If this isn't enough to get
Michel Jullian wrote:
- Original Message - From: Stephen A. Lawrence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, January
23, 2007 5:06 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using
*standard* physics
...
Good, then you do acknowledge there is *real work* being done
Terry Blanton wrote:
Precisely my conclusion last night.
Well, not to repeat the obvious, but that would eliminate the need for
an electromagnet at all... correct?
... OTOH providing just a flywheel for continuity would not be enough
unless it were geared way up -but- then friction of
[snip]
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Paul wrote:
So you need to ask yourself where that energy
comes from.
I'm well aware of that.
Good, then you do acknowledge there is *real work*
being done while two magnetic dipole moments
rotate toward alignment.
Absolutely!
six power strokes per cycle (one every 30 degrees)
oops ...every 60 degrees instead of every 30 degree... but it doesn't
change the general drift of the suggestion
Michel Jullian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using
*standard* physics
...
Good, then you do acknowledge there is *real
work*
On 1/22/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True; but the energy it takes to get over the bump doesn't depend on the
speed of rotation. It's the same whether you do it fast or slow.
This is the error in your reasoning. Assuming the kick is an EM pulse
generating, say, a 1
On 1/23/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Precisely my conclusion last night.
Well, not to repeat the obvious, but that would eliminate the need for
an electromagnet at all... correct?
Well, as of today, I am officially under contract in addition to my
NDA; but,
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Where hot rocks are available as a source of geothermal power, and these are
situated near the coast, salt water could be used as the water source. This
would produce steam to drive turbines . . .
Salt water will wreck a turbine. I doubt you can make one that would
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:40:03 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
six power strokes per cycle (one every 30 degrees)
oops ...every 60 degrees instead of every 30 degree... but it doesn't
change the general drift of the suggestion
As well as multiplying the power strokes, you
Paul wrote:
[snip]
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Paul wrote:
So you need to ask yourself where that energy
comes from.
I'm well aware of that.
Good, then you do acknowledge there is *real work*
being done while two magnetic dipole moments
rotate toward alignment.
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
[snip]
You mean sci.physics.relativity.pub? I'd like to
know
where physicists such as Ed Witten hang out
online. :-)
The news group sci.physics.relativity. It's
crawling with total
loonytunes with just a few real physicists. Ed
Witton doesn't sound
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 1/22/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True; but the energy it takes to get over the bump doesn't depend on the
speed of rotation. It's the same whether you do it fast or slow.
This is the error in your reasoning. Assuming the kick is an EM pulse
On 1/23/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think you can neglect inductance, though, for a couple reasons.
Agreed; however, the point was that the energy input decreases with
increased RPM.
The inductance must be delt with as the RPM increases. If you plot
the current
Well, first let me explain something.
I didn't pay much attention to the post I initially replied to, I didn't pay
any attention to the subject line and assumed it was a discussion going on
in a different list where the list owner (Bill Alek) expressed that he does
not believe that any magnetic
Michel Jullian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics
...
Good, then you do acknowledge there is *real work*
being
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:30:31 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/18086/
The first two comments, at the end of the article, are interesting
regarding the technology, but are not dispositive of whether or not this
company is for real with
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
six power strokes per cycle
As well as multiplying the power strokes, you also multiply the sticky points.
Yes, of course. I think you got almost there - to finding a glimmer of
the ultimate tactic to push this to the limit. What we need to add into
the
On 1/23/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
six power strokes per cycle
As well as multiplying the power strokes, you also multiply the sticky points.
Yes, of course. I think you got almost there - to finding a glimmer of
the ultimate tactic to push this to
Paul wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
[snip]
You mean sci.physics.relativity.pub? I'd like to
know
where physicists such as Ed Witten hang out
online. :-)
The news group sci.physics.relativity. It's
crawling with total
loonytunes with just a few real physicists. Ed
Witton
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Paul wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
[snip]
You mean sci.physics.relativity.pub? I'd like
to
know
where physicists such as Ed Witten hang out
online. :-)
The news group sci.physics.relativity. It's
crawling with total
loonytunes
23 matches
Mail list logo
