OrionWorks wrote:
From Nick Palmer,
... It would be ironic if they rediscover CF as an
annoying side effect that hinders their project!
It is occasionally a good idea to step outside of the confines of
one's highly trained skill set (and stated objectives), to view the
bigger picture.
OrionWorks wrote:
From Nick Palmer,
... It would be ironic if they rediscover CF as an
annoying side effect that hinders their project!
It is occasionally a good idea to step outside of the confines of
one's highly trained skill set (and stated objectives), to view the
bigger
Esa Ruoho wrote:
hmm?
Video: Water into fuel?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/free_energy/message/28577;_ylc=X3oDMTJvMjJnaTJiBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzQwOTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDgyNjg1BG1zZ0lkAzI4NTc3BHNlYwNkbXNnBHNsawN2bXNnBHN0aW1lAzExODAxMzgxMTg-
Salt water eh? I assume that
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Fri, 25 May 2007 01:34:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 24 May 2007 09:58:18 -0700:
There may be a simpler explanation:-
O16 + D - F18 + 7.5 MeV
F18 decays to O18.
This would require
Out of Time Quote:
No one wants to predict definitely how long it will take. It couldn't
possibly be less than ten years, says Sir John Cockcroft. It might be
as long as 50. Twenty plus is about the most reasonable guess.
(still one year to go for Sir John's prediction ;-)
Hmm... Perhaps...
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 25 May 2007 16:18:55 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Giffen makes the mistake of measuring demand by the total amount spent on the
product rather than the actual number of items traded.
Giffen paradox
(c.1895)
Proposed by Scottish economist Sir Robert Giffen
6 matches
Mail list logo
