Howdy Esa,
Thanks for the post on the vortex hydropower system. Good design.
Richard
On Jun 30, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 30, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Open source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source
Prior art
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_art
Mud:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mud
Well isn't that special
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/06/water_vortex_drives_power_plan.html
The *diameter* of the vortex basin is 5 meters.
The *head* - difference between the two water levels - is 1.6 meters.
The turbine produced *50.000 kw/h* in its first year of operation.
*Construction cost* was 57.000 Euro
W
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 30, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Open source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source
Prior art
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_art
Mud:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mud
Well isn't that special. Your future mud bath plans Horace?
On Jun 30, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Open source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source
Prior art
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_art
Mud:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mud
Regards,
Horace Heffner
On Jun 30, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Jed Rothwell wrote:
I looked at the video again. That is not a siphon, because the pipe
coming down is not full. There is plenty of air. The pump really is
pushing the water up 3 meters. As I said that takes ~120 W, judging
by fish-pond pumps
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 30, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Hi,
As a side note there was a major update to my research outline page.
http://emwiki.info
Yesterday I provided two of my "Free Energy" designs,
Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I looked at the video again. That is not a siphon, because the pipe
> coming down is not full. There is plenty of air. The pump really is
> pushing the water up 3 meters. As I said that takes ~120 W, judging
> by fish-pond pumps, which are pretty efficient.
Indeed it seem
On Jun 30, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Hi,
As a side note there was a major update to my research outline page.
http://emwiki.info
Yesterday I provided two of my "Free Energy" designs, one being a
mechanica
--
Michel
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Hi,
As a side note there was a major update to my research outline page.
http://emwiki.info
Yesterday I provided two of my "Free Energy" designs, one being a
mechanical version. This was published in Steorn forum, which
Nobody here has heard of the de Broglie wavelength?
Lambda = h/p.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.edn.com/article/CA6454543.html?industryid=47037&nid=2012
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Hi,
As a side note there was a major update to my research outline page.
http://emwiki.info
Yesterday I provided two of my "Free Energy" designs, one being a
mechanical version. This was published in Steorn forum, which I
commented on the
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:09 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Size of the electron
Hoyt,
> Regarding the size of the electron, Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System
> has a precise answer:
> Diameter = 320.54
15 matches
Mail list logo
