Hi
A professor on a seminar yesterday said plate tectonics have a role in CO2
emission.
Anyone here knows more?
David
--
David Jonsson
Sweden
phone callto:+46703000370
Vo,
This LHC white elephant is being strongly hyped in the UK. Keynesians and
Free-marketers go hang! How about commonsense? If this is the face of state
subsidised science Heck help us, mind you toadying to the Dragon's Den
doesn't look good either...
Here are some comments I saw on a
Makes sense, since plate tectonics obviously have a role in volcanic activity,
which has a role in CO2 emission (cf the nice postings by Stephen and Taylor in
the Thawing... thread explaining how the planet may have recovered from
snowball Earth conditions thanks to volcanic CO2 emission and
Positive or negative? Seems like more tectonic movement causes more CO2? On
the other hand biomass might get covered when a plate goes below another. I
suppose this is a necessity for oil production?
Here is a link http://dilu.bol.ucla.edu/ . The relations seems complex.
The PDF of the lecture
Not just for blondes anymore ...
http://techrepublic-cnet.com.com/military-tech/?keyword=Perosin
#4
Since the outcome will be highly arcane and only understandable to the few
initiated (since no engineering applications below about 10^-10metres,
engineering makes theories real) we will be told that the Universe is made
from quarks and strings held together by glue-on and this will be based on
Or:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_pack
Note that Jetpack International's H2O2 packs are not for sale.
Terry
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not just for blondes anymore ...
http://techrepublic-cnet.com.com/military-tech/?keyword=Perosin
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not just for blondes anymore ...
Oh, neither is lipstick. g,d,r
Indeed I would think more tectonic activity more volcanic activity more
CO2, I don't see why the biomass which gets covered would counter that, on the
contrary it seems to replenish the magma's carbon content, enabling CO2
emission by future volcanoes erupting downstream as shown on the nice
Frank,
I wish you well. Creativity not brute force is the way to solve problems.
This current generation are no match for the people who founded QM, did the
Manhattan Project, the Moonshots. They seem to be
wannabe/acolyte/bandwagoners joining the big sexy projects - genius by
association.
I wouldnt think the carbon content needs replenishment, more the
oxygen content.
In addition, it would help free pockets of gas into the atmosphere. I
dont think hiding biomass would be big, as any biomass it submerges
was already taken out of the system in terms of peat and loam.
On Wed, Sep
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:34:52 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Not just for blondes anymore ...
http://techrepublic-cnet.com.com/military-tech/?keyword=Perosin
A search on Perosin yielded http://www.chemdrug.com/MSDSInfo.asp?ID=4311. Food
for conspiracy fans?
Regards,
12 matches
Mail list logo
