RE: [Vo]:Living proof that there is doubt

Robin, Thanks. Right you are, wrt 39Ar Goes to show ya' that one should never try to compose such messages from memory, without going back to notes. However, the main point that I was shooting at in that posting, should have been obvious and is unchanged: there is a much greater probability f

Re: [Vo]:Living proof that there is doubt

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:11:56 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Anyway - This potential problem in LENR, which will certainly get the NRC >involved eventually - is due to three separate factors. > >1) neutrons - if SPAWAR and others are correct. >Even a few neutrons are problema

Re: [Vo]:What does processed uranium oxide cost?

Turns out that yellowcake was an integral part of the banking "bomb" that brought the vaunted Lehman to its knees.. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aVgwamEW_98I&refer=news Hmm. that was metaphorically another kind of 'critical mass' no? IOW 'Leverage' seems to have its own t

Re: [Vo]:60 Minutes, Orion Works, Jed, Jones

Mike Carrell wrote: Guys, heads up, it is going to get interesting. The 60 minutes piece is a turning point worthy of celebration. Both technologies also point to a new era of physical understanding of the world. Sorting all this out will keep generations of grad students busy as the old gua

[Vo]: 60 Minutes - One intelligent critique.

Out of all the comments on the 60-minutes website, there is ONE reasonable critique which shows the person put some effort to research the subject matter and he asks some legitimate questions. I'd be very interested in reading Jed's, Ed's and any other Vorts' analysis of this gentlemen's mater