John,
OK so you want actual numbers regarding battery savings. Let's study
the case of the latest version (3G-S, July 2009) of the popular iPhone
smartphone:
http://www.apple.com/batteries/iphone.html :
A properly maintained iPhone battery is designed to retain up to 80%
of its original capacity
Ok, so why didn't they pursue tritium? And should we consider looking
for tritium in the CFP kit?
Michel
2009/9/20, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
No. Given who they are, and who they are funded by, the most logical
That's not how inductive or resonant transfer works.
Imagine a magnet rotating in space end over end, does it's field radiate
like rays of light? No.
Does it lose (radiate) much energy? No.
However it is possible to tap energy from it if close enough to it.
Now as for the ring of metal, did you
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Indeed, a significant number of publications do not need to be printed in
hardcopy. I would like to see newspapers, magazines, and periodicals
embrace
this technology.
They are already, and they will go all-electronic when e-book readers
improve. I have a Kindle
Michel Jullian wrote:
Ok, so why didn't they pursue tritium? And should we consider looking
for tritium in the CFP kit?
Read the papers and you will see the answers. These experiments are
difficult, expensive and time consuming.
Lewis was quite right that the tritium results called for
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:56:11 +1000, you wrote:
In reply to John Fields's message of Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:08:09 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:18:54 +0200, you wrote:
John, sorry for the late answer.
Unwanted induction heating on rings necklaces etc: they say it doesn't
happen because
Further, let's say that the receiver's coil comprises 100 turns of
copper wire.^^
---
Oops...transmitter's
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
BTW while we are on the topic, consider that it might be possible to use the
lower Van Allen belt as the transmitter, allowing reception of free power.
(The belt itself is of course powered by the solar wind).
There should be a point where the
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, William Beaty wrote:
But that would be high-power RF which for some reason doesn't show up on
detectors built for that freq range.
On the other hand, if the phenomenon produced a natural amplifer and not an
ionospheric oscillator, then N. Tesla's World System might supply
At 09:37 AM 9/20/2009, you wrote:
Ok, so why didn't they pursue tritium? And should we consider looking
for tritium in the CFP kit?
It's a possibility. All we have to do is find a lab to do the
analysis, I'd say. For best results, we should look at all the
objections to the tritium findings
At 12:46 PM 9/20/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Lewis was quite right that the tritium results called for careful
examination and questioning. An expert can be certain that tritium
is real, and that it is not caused by separation, but an amateur
cannot. In fact, I doubt that most amateur cells
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:02:13 +0200, you wrote:
John,
OK so you want actual numbers regarding battery savings. Let's study
the case of the latest version (3G-S, July 2009) of the popular iPhone
smartphone:
http://www.apple.com/batteries/iphone.html :
A properly maintained iPhone battery is
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:54:05 -0500, you wrote:
Since the wireless system is 50% efficient it'll eat 1.8kWh while
delivering 1.8kWh, while the wired system, being 90% efficient, will eat
only 0.2kWh.
At USD 0.1 per kWh, that's $1.80 for the wireless system, while only
$0.2 for the wired system.
In reply to William Beaty's message of Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:08:24 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
BTW while we are on the topic, consider that it might be possible to use the
lower Van Allen belt as the transmitter, allowing reception of free power.
(The
14 matches
Mail list logo
