I think one problem is that of perception...
Wikipedia despite some errors (possibly not more than professional
encyclopedias) and temporary vandalization is of a decent standard.
The article on cold fusion is (without checking I feel confident in saying)
decent.
I'm sure many well established ph
[I sent a version of this previously, that did not appear to go through.]
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax found the Encyclopedia Britannica article on fusion:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/421667/nuclear-fusion/259125/Cold-fusion-and-bubble-fusion
This is part of a larger article about fusion, w
This is my preferred encyclopedia:
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Main_Page
>From Frank:
> My last show was the number on on U tube.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ykCWaVcjSA
A very enjoyable and informative series. Hope it helps additional
recognition.
Thanks, Frank.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
1.094 million meters per second is the velocity of sound with the nucleons.
_http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapterb.html#Pg10_
(http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapterb.html#Pg10)
I would like to get a book out and, make, not loose, money.
Any ideas.
Frank Znidarsic
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
It's really an aspect of the problem of scale. Those who could do
something about it are overwhelmed and must make snap judgments, so
when an issue is complex, really bad decisions are made.
This is true, and it is difficult problem. Sometimes, this is what
causes
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax found the Encyclopedia Britannica article on fusion:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/421667/nuclear-fusion/259125/Cold-fusion-and-bubble-fusion
This is part of a larger article about fusion, which is pretty good.
It is written by Robert W. Conn, who is apparently t
Stephen sez:
>> I recommend Wikipedia be renamed to OAHpedia.
>>
>> That's pronounced as: "Oh Pedia" *
>>
>> * The "OAH" stands for "occasionally accurate hearsay".
>>
>> Do I hear a second?
>
> If you care enough to check sources, an awful lot of the facts in
> Wikipedia are referenced to externa
On 01/27/2010 04:48 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
> I recommend Wikipedia be renamed to OAHpedia.
>
> That's pronounced as: "Oh Pedia" *
>
> * The "OAH" stands for "occasionally accurate hearsay".
>
> Do I hear a second?
If you care enough to check sources, an awful lot of the fact
On 01/27/2010 04:38 PM, John Berry wrote:
> Papp submarine?
> Plane tickets?
>
> Seems there is more I don't know about Papp than I'd have thought.
Yeah, he invented a jet submarine, designed it, built it in his garage
out of plywood and spare washing machine parts, and then took it to
France,
I recommend Wikipedia be renamed to OAHpedia.
That's pronounced as: "Oh Pedia" *
* The "OAH" stands for "occasionally accurate hearsay".
Do I hear a second?
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Papp submarine?
Plane tickets?
Seems there is more I don't know about Papp than I'd have thought.
There is also US *Patent* 3977191 - *Atomic* expansion reflex optics power
optics power source (AEROPS)
Which is very similar.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> On
At 10:35 AM 1/27/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
There was a well publicized comparison made of Britannica versus
Wikipedia a few years ago. Conclusion:
"Wikipedia is about as good a source of accurate information as
Britannica, the venerable standard-bearer of facts about the world
around us, acc
On 01/27/2010 03:48 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
> In reply to froarty...@comcast.net's message of Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:40:18
> +
> (UTC):
> Hi,
> [snip]
>> There was mention of a combustion engine in new IE issue using inert gases.
>> Is this what
>> SPICE is based on? could one gas act
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:09:31 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
>> SPAM - SPurious Advertising Material.
>
>Also SPiced hAM:
That was the original definition before the advent of the Internet.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http
Tesla said the sun takes in more energy than it puts out regarding ether- very
much like Puthoffs atomic model
and attributed radioactivty to this force of ether. I have been of the same
opinion for radioactive and pyrophoric materials but am having difficulty
expressing my concept. I believe v
In reply to froarty...@comcast.net's message of Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:40:18 +
(UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
>There was mention of a combustion engine in new IE issue using inert gases. Is
>this what
>SPICE is based on? could one gas act like an electrolyte while compressing
>"bubbles" of
>the other gas?
There was mention of a combustion engine in new IE issue using inert gases. Is
this what
SPICE is based on? could one gas act like an electrolyte while compressing
"bubbles" of
the other gas?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Kyle Mcallister
wrote:
> For some reason, I could see that being one of Bob Park's "What's New"
> statements. He sure as hell seems to think this way.
>
> Hmm... Does the similarity mean that we should take Park's reporting about as
> seriously as The Onion?
Correction: "that the effect is absent at say 8 or 12 MHz ?" in the example
below.
Perhaps the easiest QM effect to play around with - for proving Frank's
theory is electron tunneling. Intel uses this billions of times per second
in its chips, which presumably operate at way over the threshold
Very impressive video, Frank.
However, I will have to admit that I still do not understand the
significance of a "constant" for "the velocity of the transitional quantum
state" - well enough to see how it should be useful.
If there is real predictive value to ~megahertz-meter, for instance
My last show was the number on on U tube.
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ykCWaVcjSA_
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ykCWaVcjSA)
Frank Znidarsic
Steven Krivit wrote:
I am editing papers for a REAL encyclopedia. Every once in a while
authors will submit papers that include references to Wikipedia. I
tell them all that such references are unacceptable. End of story.
I have edited many books and papers. I might suggest that an authors
n
It’s been my experience that whenever a subject being researched is
initially perceived in black & white terms, there seems to be a
tendency to filter the sources. In such cases it doesn’t seem to
matter all that much what sources one uses as “references.”
As the old saying goes: Get a second opin
On 01/27/2010 12:57 AM, Steven Krivit wrote:
> At 02:27 PM 1/26/2010, you wrote:
>> Just ignore it. Don't mess with free speech.
>
> I am editing papers for a REAL encyclopedia. Every once in a while
> authors will submit papers that include references to Wikipedia. I tell
> them all that such r
25 matches
Mail list logo
