Re: [Vo]:My word, Lane doing a good job

2010-11-04 Thread John Berry
On listening to the video again, I see I am probably wrong on Larry Springs and you disagreeing about the length of a photon, really that isn't debatable. But I really think you should look into his model and the reasons for it, for instance one test he did that I recall was to make a waveguide th

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Progress in One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project

2010-11-04 Thread Harry Veeder
I don't care what people want beyond what they need and deserve to get. Harry > >From: Jed Rothwell >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Sent: Thu, November 4, 2010 4:29:33 PM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Progress in One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project > > >Steven V Johnson wrote: > >> Many years ago

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Progress in One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project

2010-11-04 Thread Harry Veeder
> > My sediments as well. One has to ask: after the third world is > healthy, what will they do with the rest of their healthy lives. play video games. Harry

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Progress in One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project

2010-11-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Steven V Johnson wrote: > > Many years ago Bill Gates said that Third World people do not need > > computers, they need food and medical care. Gates is a great humanitarian > > philanthropist, and he knew a lot about Third World conditions, but he > was > > wrong about that. > > My sediments as

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Progress in One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project

2010-11-04 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
>From Jed: > This project was started many years ago by Nicholas Negroponte of MIT. The > goal is to give a laptop to every Third World child. That is, a laptop the > child can keep as personal property, and take home. See: > > http://laptop.org/en/ ... > Many years ago Bill Gates said that Thir

Re: [Vo]:My word, Lane doing a good job

2010-11-04 Thread John Berry
http://www.larryspring.com/ Ah, here his site is, it seems there is quite a bit more than just his info on the photon. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:55 AM, John Berry wrote: > Frank, I don't think that is quite right... > > Larry Springs made a book I've got lyring arou

Re: [Vo]:My word, Lane doing a good job

2010-11-04 Thread John Berry
Frank, I don't think that is quite right... Larry Springs made a book I've got lyring around here and he makes a very strong case for the width being half the wavelength (when collapsed). But I think he claims the length is twice as long as you do, so twice as long but half as wide might give the

RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:High frequency UV radiation = VUV

2010-11-04 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Scott, On pg 2 of your paper you state "The cavity does not move itself; rather, the Quantum-Vacuum can move the entire five-sided cavity as long as the cavity still exists." - I Agree you create what Puthoff would call a "pressure" differential but IMHO the "directional" force y

Re: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:NanoSpire

2010-11-04 Thread Roarty, Francis X
"Unreliable" yes but it was demonstrated over a much longer period than the bursts seen in Rowan confirmations of Rayney nickel and atomic hydrogen. I still contend that this process by it's very nature is destructive because it will runaway and destroy the geometry responsible for the OU. The

[Vo]:1st proof of antigravity and Lane take some credit for it

2010-11-04 Thread fznidarsic
I have been saying for a long time that energy levels of the atom exist as point of electromagnetic and gravitomagnetic accessibility. You pointed out to me that the energy levels of the atom exist as points of electrimagnetic and gravitomagnetic discontinuity The states between are point

[Vo]:My word, Lane doing a good job

2010-11-04 Thread fznidarsic
Lane is doing a fantistic job. Take a look at this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-G2Juj_17U

Re: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:NanoSpire

2010-11-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: From the evidence and tests which were run at the time, and Jed may have more to say about this, many careful observers were open to the conclusion that Griggs may have seen OU at time, but unreliably. That is correct. It was unreliable or sporadic. When the apparent OU sta