In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:40:31 -0700:
Hi,
I wasn't implying that "Isomere energy" violated CoE. I was referring to your
statement that the whole process would be 'double exotherm' which I took to mean
that both the creation and destruction of the isomere would yiel
In reply to francis 's message of Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:02:35 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin,
>
>Any of the non nuclear or hybrid theories like Jones', Mills', Rossi or
>Haisch - Moddel also violate the first law because the first law assumes ZPE
>cannot be exploited. What Puthoff refers to as vacuum engi
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Dennis wrote:
> the cooling ponds
I sorta got that; but, was having problems equating diapers with
water. Seemed antipodal.
Which, by the way, has an answer of 4% for those following closely.
Now, anyone care to explain why?
:-)
T
It appears that neither Italy nor Greece have nuclear reactors for
commercial power. Can anyone find otherwise?
T
Robin,
Any of the non nuclear or hybrid theories like Jones', Mills', Rossi or
Haisch - Moddel also violate the first law because the first law assumes ZPE
cannot be exploited. What Puthoff refers to as vacuum engineering or
suppression provides a loophole to this assumption upon which a Heisenber
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
>How would the nucleus deform into the active isomer is the real question,
>and/or can the deformation be itself be exothermic so that there is a
>'double exotherm' all caused by the same stimulus ? There are too few
papers
>to base an informed
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 20 Mar 2011 12:10:33 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>How would the nucleus deform into the active isomer is the real question,
>and/or can the deformation be itself be exothermic so that there is a
>'double exotherm' all caused by the same stimulus ? There are too few
Robin,
* If the energy from the ZPE is being replenished by Te125m, decaying to
Te125 (stable), then you need some Te125m to start off with. However this
isotope has a half life of only 57 days, so there isn't any in nature.
True but the point (not explained well) is that there is lots of
the cooling ponds
--
From: "Terry Blanton"
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 1:00 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Japan Explains Nuclear Problem to Japanese Kids
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXPN4dfBAGU
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXPN4dfBAGU
> Totally nutty, just like you'd expect :)
>
OMG.
Okay, I get the gas and poo analogies; but, WTF is the diaper?
T
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXPN4dfBAGU
Totally nutty, just like you'd expect :)
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
> The best place for the generators would be on top of the containment
> buildings...
> After all, if the water got that high, you wouldn't need any backup
> generators to pump cooling
> water!
Maybe. But although possibly water logged, the
The best place for the generators would be on top of the containment
buildings...
After all, if the water got that high, you wouldn't need any backup generators
to pump cooling
water! :-)
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 20,
CBS is reporting that TEPCo is declaring the reactors safe:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/20/world/main20045132.shtml?tag=breakingnews
It wasn't clear to me that the spent fuel ponds require constant
circulation and heat removal through exchangers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spent_fue
OK - this may be even a little further out of the box than my norm but have
often wondered how the Puthoff atomic model of a balanced ground state orbit
takes radioactivity into account.
If the ZPE falls short of pushing the orbit up to a stable radius such that
it fluctuates between different st
15 matches
Mail list logo
