So, every once in a while, when my schedule permits, I returned to this list
to see if this list has become more useful with less noise and crap from the
usual violators, and lo and behold same off-topic crap from the same group
of off-topic crappers. But what really caught my attention t
a.ashfield wrote:
>
> I have been following the subject fairly closely. I'm not about to start
> yet another discussion on AGW. I've written hundreds of posts on that
> already. That the IPCC forecast has been falsified for the average of the
> models and most of the individual models you can
Jed,
I have been following the subject fairly closely. I'm not about to
start yet another discussion on AGW. I've written hundreds of posts on
that already. That the IPCC forecast has been falsified for the average
of the models and most of the individual models you can read about on
Lucia'
a.ashfield wrote:
>
> Perhaps more to the point, global temperature has not risen for 16 years
> falsifying the IPCC forecast.
>
You may be referring to the UK Met data that supposedly showed no rise in
surface temperature. That is a mistake. The person who made that claim
chose the wrong starti
from quantumheat.org
Let the Data Flood Commence!
on 03 December 2012.
I hope you are all ready for this, in the next couple of weeks we are
all going to have an immense amount of data to work through and we are
going to need your help looking for anomalies, patterns, features and
most importa
Unless you are a tree...
Trees will rule in the next Century...
I could not afford a beach house anyway...:)
On Monday, December 3, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> a.ashfield 'a.ashfi...@verizon.net');>> wrote:
>
> More crap. Without "polluting" CO2 there would be no life on this planet.
>>
>
> W
even more interesting is with the microelements
as Cobalt, this was the subject of my wife's diploma work in Chemistry. but
many other elements are necessary for life.
Peter
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> a.ashfield wrote:
>
> More crap. Without "polluting" CO2 there wo
a.ashfield wrote:
More crap. Without "polluting" CO2 there would be no life on this planet.
>
Without salt in your body you would die. However, if you sat down and ate a
kilogram of salt, that would kill you. In biology, a substance that is
essential in one amount may be poisonous in a much lar
I keep getting rejects when I try to respond directly; so, I'll try this:
Gamechanger is one aspect of Shell's innovation program:
http://www.shell.com/home/content/future_energy/innovation/game_changer/
If I were to seek an alliance with an oil firm, I think British
Petroleum, er, Better Produc
the list was hiccuping earlier
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> a little to the right
>
a little to the right
This experiment could inform our thinking about the ultimate causation of
the LENR reaction by remembering that charge concentration is a time
honored contender as a factor in LENR.
If it is found that a fundamental constant is not actually constant but is
in fact a function of charge concentratio
12 matches
Mail list logo
