The theoretic fecundity of Mr. Rose is enough to make MIT's patent lawyers
weep as though Hagelstein walked through the door.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_charge
>
> I believe that this excess charge comes from the direct conv
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_charge
I believe that this excess charge comes from the direct conversion of heat
(infrared light) into elections.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Axil,
>
> Would you explain what you mean by the violation of conservatio
Axil,
Would you explain what you mean by the violation of conservation of charge
since Rossi only excites the particles with heat?
What if his device separates the charges by some method so that the electrons
leave the now positively charged central region? I once figured a way to
extract
Jones Beene wrote:
By “still” do you imply some kind of recent change ? … which is to say: do
> you have information that Rossi has reneged on his arrangement with them?
>
I thought he said he is working with a major corporation.
I have no knowledge than he reneged on anyone. I assumed Ampener
Regarding the question:
2) Were the doubts/objections raised about the Tesla fields (in both this
forum and elsewhere) considered before drafting the paper (and therefore
double checked), or not considered important and drafted despite them? Have
those objections been put to rest as far as you are
While you are waiting for the authoritative answers from DGT if any, I will
take the liberty to speculate on the answers that seem right to me (at this
juncture).
It is not possible to actually visualize what these subatomic structures
are doing, but by using imagination, some new experimental pro
On Saturday, October 26, 2013 8:35:34 PM UTC-4, JohnMaguire wrote:
>
> Peter, Dr. Hadjichristos,
>>
>
> Thank you for your efforts. Few questions/observations after reading the
> paper that perhaps you can take a moment to comment on:
>
> 1) Magnetic fields (caused by ion migration) trap exci
Jed, he is just stating that he believes that the COE is valid. So far I have
not seen any systems that break this conservation law as long as you include
the energy associated with mass conversion.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sat, Oct 26, 2013 5:
Blaze, that is my suspicion as well. Does anyone know the source of the
energy? Have they made any claims?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: blazespinnaker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sat, Oct 26, 2013 5:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Waltzing Hammers
This isn't ‘perpetual motion machine’. Its n
>
> Peter, Dr. Hadjichristos,
>
Thank you for your efforts. Few questions/observations after reading the
paper that perhaps you can take a moment to comment on:
1) Magnetic fields (caused by ion migration) trap excited Rydberg state
hydrogen. Therefore the NAE are these localized "trap" zone
Hard to say... Maybe some combination of the earth’s rotation and celestial
gravity. That is if it actually works as described.
All I’m sure of is that it isn’t generating energy out of nothing.
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 3:16 PM
T
From: blazespinna...@gmail.com
This isn't ‘perpetual motion machine’. Its not breaking the law of
conversation of energy. If it works, its getting energy from somewhere.
For gravity to provide continuous energy, it must usable some asymmetry.
Tidal energy depends mostly on the a
more diplomatically I make a contribution. no edit...
I keep the evidences (as pdf)
http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?2481-Wikipedia-self-appointed-guardian-erased-Elforsk-article-in-2-minutes&p=5906#post5906
2013/10/26 Alain Sepeda
> we should propose to the erased a contract:
> - if
Yikes.
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 2:55 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
wrote:
This isn't ‘perpetual motion machine’. Its not breaking the law of
conversation of energy. If it works, its getting energy from somewhere.
H
By "still" do you imply some kind of recent change ? . which is to say: do
you have information that Rossi has reneged on his arrangement with them? It
was common knowledge for several years, and Rossi admitted it - but to be
honest, I do not follow this topic on a day-to-day basis.
Rossi has
wrote:
This isn't ‘perpetual motion machine’. Its not breaking the law of
> conversation of energy. If it works, its getting energy from somewhere.
>
How do you know that?
Where might the energy be coming from? Until you find the source I do not
think you can make this assertion.
- Jed
This isn't ‘perpetual motion machine’. Its not breaking the law of
conversation of energy. If it works, its getting energy from somewhere.
Sent from Windows Mail
From: a.ashfield
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 1:31 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
blazespinnaker Sat, 26 Oct 201
Jones: Where did you hear that Rossi is still allied with Ampenergo?
- Jed
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:37:04 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Personally, I do not mind a little creative accounting in astronomy if it
>prevents our understanding from falling completely apart. It is in
>business that cooking the books really bothers me.
>
It's only when our
Ken:
I'm confused by your statement:
"I am not terribly surprised that you only got 20% reliability, Harry."
Who is Harry, and where did you get this 20% reliability from???
That's not our tech.
-Mark Iverson
From: Ken Deboer [mailto:barlaz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October
blazespinnaker
<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=from:%22blazespinnaker%22>
Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:01:02 -0700
<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=date:20131026>
"Why would it cause textbooks to be rewritten? Energy fro
Why would it cause textbooks to be rewritten? Energy from gravity is already
done via tidal energy. There’s nothing to see here unless it’s economical.
We already have many forms of energy that generate power in ways that aren’t
economical. Who cares if we have yet one more (and a seeming
few point.
1- spying is happening. I know 3 cases in recent quarters. 1 builder and 2
followers, and 1 tentative to get sample, 1 computer high-profile attack
with perfect cleaning, and 1 ground intrusion by serious guys. forget
suppression, it is economic intelligence (#nsa?) as most Snowden descr
Go for it! I hope for success.
Depending on what is driving the current errors, your tech could be very
useful right now, because what's needed, over a day, is more the trends
than the absolute measurement.
Your device with a daily calibration against a conventional "stick"
would perhaps gi
Glad to see interest stilll in the very much needed noninvasive glucose
testing and wish you all much success. While I didn't work directly with
methods for glucose tests or with diabetes particularly, I did work, a
long time ago for sure, on related subjects and found maybe some things you
migh
Jones Beene,
What makes you think Rossi's partner is still AmpEnergo? Their single
press release is dated Jun 2011.
Rossi says he now has three teams (twenty something people) and there is
supposed to be a group working on the automated factory.
AmpEnergo doesn't seem to consist of more than a
we should propose to the erased a contract:
- if the LENR is proven you are fired
or you let the data leak.
normally he will wait to be fired because of Groupthink & collective
Delusion.
2013/10/26 Jed Rothwell
> Alan Fletcher wrote:
>
>
>> Gee .. a very bland summary on wiki lasted all of
From: Jed Rothwell
a.ashfield wrote:
"Rossi had no trouble convincing the Swedish Skeptic Society
guy."
The problem is, few people believed him. Certainly not the
diehard critics or the main media or mainstream s
What you might need to do in your book is justify the LENR view of reality
before you get into detail. The electron and light are the same thing
topologically. The electron is just a defect or break in light. Both the
electron and light “emerge” from the fabric of the vacuum.
Without this ne
Ol' Bab,
Beg to differ: our noninvasive tech would allow you to test 100 times a day
if you wanted, without ANY pain, ever, and for pennies/test. The device
would cost a third of what you spend on test-strips each year, and it'll
last for 3 to 5 years; do the math...
-Mark
-Original Message--
Alan Fletcher wrote:
> Gee .. a very bland summary on wiki lasted all of 2 minutes :
>
> In September 2013 the Swedish Electrical Utilities’ R & D Company Elforsk
> . . .
Do you mean you added this to the Wikipedia "cold fusion" article? And
within 2 minutes someone erased it? They must have
a.ashfield wrote:
> "Rossi had no trouble convincing the Swedish Skeptic Society guy."
>
> The problem is, few people believed* him*. Certainly not the diehard
> critics or the main media or mainstream science.
>
If Rossi wanted to convince many people he could keep inviting new people
in. Aft
There are some interesting ideas here. I guess it could be possible that he got
a couple things right, it is not likely though. It seems to me if cold fusion
was really this successful there would be a lot more people working on it. I
one thing that is completely obvious to me is that all of the
Beg to differ: We are having a mad desire for CHEAPER blood testing.
$1.20/stab is too much at 3 to 4 per day. Medicare only covers 2.
The pain? Very little, often none.
Ol' Bab
On 10/25/2013 1:15 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
I ran across this article which might be of interest:
http://www.
Much appreciate the heads-up Terry!
Optical methods have been tried for 30+ years and gobbled up several B$s,
and still no regulatory approval! The latest optical corpse is
C8Medisensor... they consumed $120M, got CE Mark last Oct, and 4 months
later (Jan '13) went TU... Investing in an optical m
35 matches
Mail list logo
