I agree.. Conclusion?
Lenart
On May 29, 2014 9:11 PM, "Axil Axil" wrote:
> The amount of time and mental enegy required to absorb Mills technology is
> very substantial. Is it real or is it a fantasy? Who can be a judge? The
> perspective student of this course of study must be convinced that thi
The amount of time and mental enegy required to absorb Mills technology is
very substantial. Is it real or is it a fantasy? Who can be a judge? The
perspective student of this course of study must be convinced that this
substantial effort is not made in vain.
BLP is like a company who has not made
Latest R. Mills Test:
https://i.imgur.com/oTvxD5Q.gif
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:49 AM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 28 May 2014 15:22:28 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >More
> >
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture
> >
> >This is a special sort of radioactive decay m
Axil, I agree, said simply this is equivalence, if the paradox twin could
somehow come to rest at an event horizon or to a lesser extent land on a dead
star his equivalent acceleration would provide dilation equivalent to actual
spatial displacement – the ether accelerating thru the object vs
I have posted to Vo and CNMS a series of notes under the general heading of
‘understanding BLP’ which have been generally ignored. The post below
illustrates a basic problem, that these commentators have simply not done their
homework well enough to evaluate what is really going on and the diffi
For those who thought the following explanation from an
previous post (positronium reacting with deuterium) - for the proper
understanding of the recent Mizuno experiment (aka "deuterium fission" from
the MIT colloquium) was a bit over the top... a partial level of
confirmation has
Another way to get time dilation is through density. Packing lots of matter
into a confined space will serve just as well as applying extreme speed.
Slowing down a particle through extreme confinement will force that
particle into getting where it wants to go through tunneling. When that
particle
Is it too naïve of me to suggest that we can derive some insight from extreme
relativistic considerations where for example the paradox twin attains 99% of
C? the twins are existing in two different inertial frames 90 degrees displaced
from each other yet both still perceive themselves in norma
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Sounds like you are envisioning Dirac's sea as "like 3-space" in an inverted
> or reciprocal way. Perhaps as a strange kind of parallel universe?
I think you almost have to see it this way if PAMD's equations are to
be accepted without Feynm
9 matches
Mail list logo
