Dear Friends,
Please read:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/05/how-to-accelerate-lenr-progress-go.html
Thanks,
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Stefan, you appear to be considering the effects of multiple reflections upon
the input power calculations. This type of issue comes up when the frequency
is within the RF range, generally far above what is used during this test.
Also, with RF engineering you handle the reflections as voltage
> Where is this issue being raised?
People skeptical brings this up, of cause as you say it's possible to sill
be fooled, it needs more data to decide. I just wanted to see if there was
an
alternate explanation, and if it is sound. P(t) = U(t)I(t) does alternate
sign for suitable phase differences.
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe
I looked at the Lugano report, trying to understand the issue with the
implicate power meter
e.g. why the power loss in the cable does not follow the power measured.
Where is this issue being raised?
It will likely be impossible to know the answe
I looked at the Lugano report, trying to understand the issue with the
implicate power meter
e.g. why the power loss in the cable does not follow the power measured.
So, people have tried to explain this with some strange temperature
behavior of the resistance.
But isn't it more natural to explai
5 matches
Mail list logo