This video said microwaves. The other said terahertz radiation. I noticed
that the hydrogen burned. When water is split hydrogen and oxygen are
produced. This mixture explodes with a poping noise. For the combustion that
the video shows the oxygen must have been be removed from the gas stre
He says he is using Terahertz radiation. I has a frequency that is orders of
magnitude higher than microwave. That's the frequency of nano-meter cold
fusion operation. He does not state how he produces the terahertz radiation.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex
Terry,
Here is a video of an older device, showing the basic setup - curiously
using microwaves. The amount of gas is indeed impressive but there is no
valid proof or even raw data to show that it could be anomalous.
Plus- he is not being clear that there is a metal electrode - which is
almo
I share your reservations Stephen. Of course, if the Chinese actually state
that they have a working device I wanted to know the details. Strange things
do happen on occasion.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Dec 28, 2016 1:43 pm
Sub
There is a report that the Chinese CAST version of the EM drive is a stacked
series of drives…. Does this mean that the Chinese have seen a multiplier
effect when directing the ‘thrust’ as feed into a second drive? Or is it just a
convenient means to conserve space?
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> PETROS ZOGRAFOS is a Greek inventor who claims to split water in a way to
> get more energy out than was put into the system.
Transcript:
http://www.off-grid.net/power-tap-water/
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Eric Walker wrote:
>
>
>> One possibility is that the EM Drive may be ejecting mass, not in the
>> form of baryons, but in the form of leptons, namely, neutrinos . . .
>>
>
> That might be tricky to test for. For ordinary particles, you would
Eric Walker wrote:
> One possibility is that the EM Drive may be ejecting mass, not in the form
> of baryons, but in the form of leptons, namely, neutrinos . . .
>
That might be tricky to test for. For ordinary particles, you would put the
thing in a box and see if it stops thrusting. But neutr
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence
wrote:
Just to point something out -- the EM drive *obviously* doesn't need to be
> outside the craft to work, since it doesn't eject mass.
>
> Furthermore (and consequently), it violates conservation of momentum,
> conservation of angular mom
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-28-2016-lets-make-mmxvii-annus.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
The example sounds like a planet in orbit. Does gravity violate all the
conservation laws. Could the EMDrive use a forms of ,modified
gravity...dark matter... to spin the EmDrive around in an orbit?
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence
wrote:
> Just to point something out -- the
That's interesting. That would resolve the conservation violations.
On 12/28/2016 01:54 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
I've seen some calculations showing that there is a toroidal electric
field within the device. I wonder if the movement is due the pull of
the magnetic field of the Earth.
2016-12-
I've seen some calculations showing that there is a toroidal electric field
within the device. I wonder if the movement is due the pull of the magnetic
field of the Earth.
2016-12-28 16:43 GMT-02:00 Stephen A. Lawrence :
> Just to point something out -- the EM drive *obviously* doesn't need to
>
Just to point something out -- the EM drive /obviously/ doesn't need to
be outside the craft to work, since it doesn't eject mass.
Furthermore (and consequently), it violates conservation of momentum,
conservation of angular momentum, conservation of energy, and
conservation of mass. While da
That ‘secondhand news’ from the NASA forum is clearly described as completely
unsubstantiated speculation…. But then that’s what social media trolling is all
about. ALL that has been reported to have been said by the Chinese is that the
test “is not smooth” with no explanation as to what “smooth
Dave,
The secondhand news is that it is not working in space FWIW.
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=41732.msg1623141#msg1623141
Jack
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:08 AM David Roberson wrote:
> Russ,
>
> Can you verify that the Chinese actually have a functioning EM drive on
> the
16 matches
Mail list logo