Mixent makes a good point here. I read somewhere that UDH of was it
rydberg matter is a frozen plasma. If the definition of a plasma is total
charge separation, then UDH is a plasma. There is a positive core and a
negative electron spin wave covering that core on the outside of this
nanowire so
The science is interesting, but the camera they developed to catch the
phenomenon is incredible:
"Choi reports that the photography technique, called lossless-encoding
compressed ultrafast photography (LLE-CUP), can capture 100 billion frames
per second "
In reply to 's message of Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:55:21
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Holmilds laser source description does not indicated a chirped laser source
>IMHO.
>
>AxilWhat do yo mean by carrier material?
>
>As Axil has pointed out, the experimental process would not seem
Holmlid’s mechanism is more likely a means to make ‘spillover’ hydrogen which
is ready to become ultra-dense in a conveniently adjacent hydrogen loving
lattice. The laser stimulation helps condense the spillover hydrogen into that
ultra-dense hydrogen form which has a significant character of
Re: "Axil—What do yo mean by “carrier material”?"
The experiments of Holmlid explains how these nanoparticles work. IMHO in
the Holmlid experiment, ultra-dense hydrogen (UDH) is produced in the
presence of hydrogen by the iron oxide/potassium catalyst and falls onto
the collection foil. That foil
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2012/jul/05/new-boson-sparks-call-for-higgs-factory
New boson sparks call for 'Higgs factory'
If producing muons are so easy, why is CERN considering paying 10 to 20
billion euros for a muon facture for Higgs research?
Also see
Don't forget that is the estimated power *density* in W/cm^2 over a beam
waist cross-section of only 30 microns diameter. From the description, it
appears to be a diode pumped Nd:YAG laser that is frequency doubled (as are
most green lasers today). The 5ns pulse implies Q switching. It is a
Holmild’s laser source description does not indicated a chirped laser source
IMHO.
Axil—What do yo mean by “carrier material”?
As Axil has pointed out, the experimental process would not seem to produce
much plasma, if any, and I doubt a plasma would support the surface reaction
Holmild
Hi,
Furthermore, an accelerator will accelerate any charged particle, not just
electrons.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Hi,
It seems to me that the fact that it also works in ordinary hydrogen speaks, for
the argument that an accelerator is involved, rather than against it.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Hi,
This is the reply from Prof. Holmlid.
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:06:38 +0100, holmlid wrote:
>Dear Mr van Spaandonk,
>
>The mechanism for the nuclear reactions in H(0) is not
>
>coupled to electron acceleration. The nuclear process works also
>
>with ordinary hydrogen. I
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-23-2017-lenr-info-questions.html
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
From:
A novel model for the interpretation of the unidentified infrared (UIR)
bands from interstellar space: deexcitation of Rydberg Matter
Quote:
"Thus in the laboratory, it is sufficient to heat a graphite or
other surface with a graphite layer, or a metal oxide surface, to
rapidly form
Ok - it is likely from the specs that Holmlid's laser is not a (chirp
amplified pulse) CAP using exotic gratings and so forth. That is important.
Since it is simply a plain vanilla low-powered-pulse from a ow priced
laser ... but it a pulse which works... and if we believe it works, then
10 to the 12th watts is sufficient to cause an unlimited family of nuclear
byproducts!
LENR folks are not used to these power densities.
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 11:00 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fast particles
From:
Laser-induced fusion in ultra-dense deuterium D( 1): Optimizing MeV
particle emission by carrier material selection
Quote:
A Nd:YAG laser with an energy of <200 mJ per
each 5 ns long pulse at 10 Hz is used at 532 nm. The laser beam is
focused at the test surface with an f = 400 mm
I found the LENR Forum thread where we looked in detail at several papers
by Holmlid and Holmlid and Olafsson:
- dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.116, "Spontaneous ejection of
high-energy particles from ultra-dense deuterium D(0)", Holmlid and Olafsson
-
Holmlid has left out the most important experimental detail.
What is the laser like? I suspect it is chirped into the exowatt range where
anything can happen.
This is a rich field that does not require any suppositions about dense
hydrogen. Large accelerators became nearly obsolete by the
18 matches
Mail list logo