Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread Axil Axil
Mixent makes a good point here. I read somewhere that UDH of was it rydberg matter is a frozen plasma. If the definition of a plasma is total charge separation, then UDH is a plasma. There is a positive core and a negative electron spin wave covering that core on the outside of this nanowire so

[Vo]:High Speed Photograpyt at 100 billion frames per second

2017-01-23 Thread Ron Wormus
The science is interesting, but the camera they developed to catch the phenomenon is incredible: "Choi reports that the photography technique, called lossless-encoding compressed ultrafast photography (LLE-CUP), can capture 100 billion frames per second "

Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread mixent
In reply to 's message of Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:55:21 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Holmild’s laser source description does not indicated a chirped laser source >IMHO. > >Axil—What do yo mean by “carrier material”? > >As Axil has pointed out, the experimental process would not seem

RE: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread Russ George
Holmlid’s mechanism is more likely a means to make ‘spillover’ hydrogen which is ready to become ultra-dense in a conveniently adjacent hydrogen loving lattice. The laser stimulation helps condense the spillover hydrogen into that ultra-dense hydrogen form which has a significant character of

Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread Axil Axil
Re: "Axil—What do yo mean by “carrier material”?" The experiments of Holmlid explains how these nanoparticles work. IMHO in the Holmlid experiment, ultra-dense hydrogen (UDH) is produced in the presence of hydrogen by the iron oxide/potassium catalyst and falls onto the collection foil. That foil

Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread Axil Axil
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2012/jul/05/new-boson-sparks-call-for-higgs-factory New boson sparks call for 'Higgs factory' If producing muons are so easy, why is CERN considering paying 10 to 20 billion euros for a muon facture for Higgs research? Also see

Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread Bob Higgins
Don't forget that is the estimated power *density* in W/cm^2 over a beam waist cross-section of only 30 microns diameter. From the description, it appears to be a diode pumped Nd:YAG laser that is frequency doubled (as are most green lasers today). The 5ns pulse implies Q switching. It is a

RE: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread bobcook39923
Holmild’s laser source description does not indicated a chirped laser source IMHO. Axil—What do yo mean by “carrier material”? As Axil has pointed out, the experimental process would not seem to produce much plasma, if any, and I doubt a plasma would support the surface reaction Holmild

[Vo]:Re: Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread mixent
Hi, Furthermore, an accelerator will accelerate any charged particle, not just electrons. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

[Vo]:Re: Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread mixent
Hi, It seems to me that the fact that it also works in ordinary hydrogen speaks, for the argument that an accelerator is involved, rather than against it. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

[Vo]:(fwd) Re: Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread mixent
Hi, This is the reply from Prof. Holmlid. On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:06:38 +0100, holmlid wrote: >Dear Mr van Spaandonk, > >The mechanism for the nuclear reactions in H(0) is not > >coupled to electron acceleration. The nuclear process works also > >with ordinary hydrogen. I

[Vo]:LENR INFO, QUESTIONS

2017-01-23 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-23-2017-lenr-info-questions.html -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread Axil Axil
From: A novel model for the interpretation of the unidentified infrared (UIR) bands from interstellar space: deexcitation of Rydberg Matter Quote: "Thus in the laboratory, it is sufficient to heat a graphite or other surface with a graphite layer, or a metal oxide surface, to rapidly form

Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread Jones Beene
Ok - it is likely from the specs that Holmlid's laser is not a (chirp amplified pulse) CAP using exotic gratings and so forth. That is important. Since it is simply a plain vanilla low-powered-pulse from a ow priced laser ... but it a pulse which works... and if we believe it works, then

Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread Brian Ahern
10 to the 12th watts is sufficient to cause an unlimited family of nuclear byproducts! LENR folks are not used to these power densities. From: Axil Axil Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 11:00 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread Axil Axil
From: Laser-induced fusion in ultra-dense deuterium D( 1): Optimizing MeV particle emission by carrier material selection Quote: A Nd:YAG laser with an energy of <200 mJ per each 5 ns long pulse at 10 Hz is used at 532 nm. The laser beam is focused at the test surface with an f = 400 mm

Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.

2017-01-23 Thread Eric Walker
I found the LENR Forum thread where we looked in detail at several papers by Holmlid and Holmlid and Olafsson: - dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.116, "Spontaneous ejection of high-energy particles from ultra-dense deuterium D(0)", Holmlid and Olafsson -

Re: [Vo]:Fast particles

2017-01-23 Thread Brian Ahern
Holmlid has left out the most important experimental detail. What is the laser like? I suspect it is chirped into the exowatt range where anything can happen. This is a rich field that does not require any suppositions about dense hydrogen. Large accelerators became nearly obsolete by the