In the disclosed Maxwell's demon type of experiment from 2012, heat from
ambient air was converted completely into electric energy, using a
static magnetic field without producing any other effect.
The phenomenon proves clearly that the second law of thermodynamics is
not universally valid, ev
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
The report was credible enough for IH not to move forward on their case.
>
Unless you took part in the lawyers' negotiations, you do not know that is
the reason. It might be because they determined Rossi has no more money.
There is no point to suing someone who cannot pay.
The report was credible enough for IH not to move forward on their case.
I'm glad to see you got a start on delineating all the scientific
charlatanism in that report and in the case.
On 7/10/17, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Kevin O'Malley wrote:
>
> You're probably right. But there is evidence he h
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
You're probably right. But there is evidence he had a COP > 1 for
> some length of time according to the report by the person chosen by
> both sides to administer the test.
>
You mean the report that claims the laboratory was in a perfect vacuum, and
the flow was EXACTLY
On 7/10/17, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> I cannot judge legal standards.
***Then stop using a legal term. It's like saying that by scientific
standards and by common sense standards your neighbor is guilty of
armed robbery. If there were "scientific standards" to begin with,
we wouldn't be in thi
Proton 21 is a science based effort whose out of the box thinking and
associated results are not commercially applicable. This is why their
results are so valuable to analyze. Their methods and analysis are not
constrained by the braindead fixation of producing excess heat as detected
by calorimetr
You're probably right. But there is evidence he had a COP > 1 for
some length of time according to the report by the person chosen by
both sides to administer the test.
On 7/10/17, H LV wrote:
> Rossi was suing IH for millions of dollars, so he had to prove the device
> in Florida worked as he
Che makes a cogent point. The year long test was far more that an attempt
to extract money from IH, It was an attempt to verify a commercial product
and the attempt failed at least in Rossi's estimation. This attempt at
commercial applicability was why the test was so convoluted, inappropriate
to t
bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote:
> PS: What has happened to these folks in the last ten to 15 years? Did
> they suffer the same ridicule of being “scientific frauds” as others,
> currently and in the past, have in the field of LENR?
>
>
>
> Maybe Jed knows?
>
They come to ICCF conferences and
Jones and Axil—
A additional idea in connection with the Proton 21 folks and the Stanford
strung theory folks:
It may be that after the super heavies formed during inflation, the unstable
super superheavies evaporated/exploded and only a reduced of stable super
heavies remained, well distri
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Lennart Thornros
wrote:
> The whole discussion after the TRAIL is useless. Accusations between
> vorts, discussions trying to determine how Rossi is a fraud or not - all of
> counter productive.
> Rossi has a small window to show that he has something. His ethics
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
>
> I think the key is to just find nuclear products when you throw hydrogen
and nickel together. There is no chemical reaction that is supposed to
lead to nuclear products. 3 years ago, MFMP found gamma rays and then
just blithely started
Jones—
The big bang may still hold, if the super heavies were formed early- on, caused
the expansion early-- on (inflation) with repulsive gravity and then changed
to attractive gravity after the initial rapid inflation.
The big bang (BB) will become the standard of BB models, SOBB. It may
Rossi was suing IH for millions of dollars, so he had to prove the device
in Florida worked as he claimed. If the trial proceeded I think it is very
likely that the preponderance of the evidence would not support his claim.
Harry
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Jed Rothwell
wrote:
> Kevin O'M
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
> On 7/9/17, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> OJ Simpson...
> > Obviously he was guilty.
> ***Then obviously Rossi is Not Guilty of Fraud. You just agreed with
> the legal standard.
>
I cannot judge legal standards. By scientific standards and by common sense
standards he is guilt
On 7/9/17, Jed Rothwell wrote:
OJ Simpson...
> Obviously he was guilty.
***Then obviously Rossi is Not Guilty of Fraud. You just agreed with
the legal standard.
> All I did was read the Penon report. That's all it takes.
***Bullshit. Plenty of others have read the report and came to
different
Jed Rothwell
5:36 PM (5 hours ago)
Nope. The legal system does not sue scientists for publishing fraudulent or
idiotic reports.
***The legal system brings its resources to bear upon scientists who scam
others with fraudulent reports.
One reason is that no one can tell fools and frauds apart.
17 matches
Mail list logo