In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 3 Jun 2019 20:04:14 -0400:
Hi Jed,
[snip]
Anyone who wants something translated should get it done by someone who's first
language is the target language, and who's second language is the source
language.
The reason being that it's much easier to read a
See:
http://jcfrs.org/file/jcf19-proceedings.pdf
Other Proceedings:
http://jcfrs.org/proc_jcf.html
Okay, the second time they talk about the Ni-H experiments, they reference
Levi et al.:
61. Levi, G., et al., *Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a
reactor device containing hydrogen loaded nickel powder* 2013: Bologna
University
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LeviGindication.pd
Ah. There is a claim of excess heat from this system, by Parkhomov:
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedr.pdf#page=252
There is some confusion in the new paper from the Google researchers,
Berlinguette, C.P., et al., *Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion*.
Nature, 2019
On p. 4 it says: "Over the course of 16 months, we evaluated contemporary
claims of more than 10% excess heat production involving samples of ni
From: Brian Ahern
Macroscopic Au-Ag has no chance for RTSC …. However, nanoscale assemblies can
result in ultra conduction. Zero resistance, but no Meisner Effect.
Well, shouldn’t we give the chaps from India the benefit of doubt…?
OK … maybe not, but here is a hypothetical rationale for Au/
Macroscopic Au-Ag has no chance for RTSC.
However, nanoscale assemblies can result in ultra conduction. Zero
resistance, but no Meisner Effect.
From: JonesBeene
Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 1:05 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:RTSC results confirmed … we
7 matches
Mail list logo