Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
> Do we get a chance to see what other projects were proposed (at least
> titles)? It may be that these eight were the best of a poor selection.
>
I did not see any list of proposed projects. Perhaps there was one? I was
not following the story closely. Someone on the
Jed,
Do we get a chance to see what other projects were proposed (at least
titles)? It may be that these eight were the best of a poor selection.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 10:04 AM Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I put this DoE announcement in the LENR-CANR.org News section. Today I
> added this somewhat
Related to this, here is the DoE ARPA-E list of 39 Teeming Partners who are
working on cold fusion. The heading on this list says:
*“By enabling and publishing the Teaming Partner List, ARPA-E is not
endorsing, sponsoring, or otherwise evaluating the qualifications of the
individuals and
The philosophy of bullshit. How do we define bullshit? Does intention
matter? Calling bullshit as a speech act.
~ 11 minutes
https://youtu.be/S_ommr0Te4A
Harry
I put this DoE announcement in the LENR-CANR.org News section. Today I
added this somewhat pessimistic note:
Some cold fusion researchers feel that these eight projects were poorly
chosen. The goals are framed as if cold fusion is the same as plasma
fusion. People made this mistake in 1989. For
5 matches
Mail list logo
