And then there's bug chitin:
http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 6:37 PM Frogfall wrote:
> Have a look at this report:
>
> NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
> https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
> Published 1998
>
> This stuff was all quite
Have a look at this report:
NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
Published 1998
This stuff was all quite open at the time.
In the UK, British Aerospace was also funding antigravity studies, in the shape
of "Project Greenglow" - which was
Robin wrote:
> >I exclude robot readers after identifying them by various methods.
>
> Why would you exclude them? Surely allowing access would ensure that
> people doing searches would be more likely to find
> the site?
>
Perhaps I should make it clear I am not actually excluding anyone. That
Okay, I found 4,697 records associated with an AI project. I filtered those
out, bringing the July total down to 23,151. It is still substantially more
than the previous month.
https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1213
also means that "they" have been lying about the theoretical physics -
namely Einstein has a lot of things wrong (such as Equivalence
Principle) but "they" haven't been allowing those things to be
corrected.
-- Original Message --
From: "Terry Blanton"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
If there's any truth to the testimony before Congress, we already have the
tech.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 5:56 AM ROGER ANDERTON
wrote:
> <
>
> I got antigravity because Einstein wrong about Equivalence Principle.
>
>
> see video
>
>
> CY LO, DAVID P. CHAN & RICHARD C. Y. HUI - Oversights of
7 matches
Mail list logo
